[CCWG-ACCT] CWG Meeting Notes related to expectations from CCWG

Wed Apr 15 09:03:43 UTC 2015

Hi Giovanni, 

The Design Team on Budget in the CWG worked with Xavier Calvez and received
an itemization of IANA operation costs for the FY15 budget. With this
received information, the recommendation looked to FY16 and beyond. You can
review the documents provided by Xavier here:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/DT-O+Budget.

The CWG will be submitting comments to the FY16 public comment to submit the
recommendations regarding itemizations for IANA operating costs. If the
information collected by the Design Team on Budget is useful for ccNSO SOP
comments, please feel free to refer to this information. If you would like
to discuss further, I can put you in touch with Chuck Gomes, who lead the
Design Team on Budget.

Best, 
Grace
(staff support)

From:  Giovanni Seppia <Giovanni.Seppia at eurid.eu>
Date:  Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 4:48 AM
To:  Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
Cc:  Accountability Cross Community
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CWG Meeting Notes related to expectations from
CCWG

Dear Mathieu, 

Thanks for this.

Concerning “Future FY ICANN Operating Plans & Budgets, and if possible even
the FY16 ICANN Operating Plan & Budget, include at a minimum itemization of
all IANA operations costs in the FY ICANN Operating Plan & Budget to the
project level and below as needed.”, I’d like to remind the group that the
ccNSO Strategy and Operating Plan working group has requested this kind of
information countlessly over the past eight years. When responding to the
request, ICANN staff underlined the difficulties relating to such cost
itemisation because of various issues. I am not saying we should lose faith
in having them one day, but the community may get answers very similar to
what we already heard.

As ccNSO SOP chair, I will make sure this request is well highlighted in the
coming ccNSO SOP comment on the FY16 ICANN Operating Plan & Budget.

Best,

Giovanni

On 15 Apr 2015, at 10:34, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> I am pasting below the notes of CWG Meeting #40 which addressed the topics of
> expectations towards our group.
> 
> This is of course very relevant to our work, in terms of drafting our
> recommendations as well as the consideration of our workplan and timeline.
> 
> Best,
> Mathieu
> 
> -------- Message transféré --------
> Sujet :     [CWG-Stewardship] Notes Meeting #40 at 14:00 UTC
> Date :     Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:51:43 +0000
> De :     Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
> Pour :     cwg-stewardship at icann.org <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
> 
> 4. Instructions for CCWG?
> 
> 
> 
> • ICANN budget (in particular, the requirement for transparency around cost
> allocation in relation to the IANA functions)
> 
> 
> 
> Response: The CWG supports the idea of budget veto tool, and the CWG expects
> the CCWG to deliver on this ability for the community to veto the budget.
> Furthermore, with regards to the details to be provided in relation to the
> IANA budget, the CWG is expected to recommend as part of its transition plan
> that:
> 
> 1. The IANA Function’s comprehensive costs should be transparent for any
> future state of the IANA Function.
> 
> 2. Future FY ICANN Operating Plans & Budgets, and if possible even the FY16
> ICANN Operating Plan & Budget, include at a minimum itemization of all IANA
> operations costs in the FY ICANN Operating Plan & Budget to the project level
> and below as needed.
> 
> 
> 
> • Community empowerment mechanisms (in particular, relating to a confidence
> vote option) –
> 
> 
> 
> Response: As part of the structure that the CWG is currently considering
> (Internal accountability hybrid model: legal separation variant), the CWG will
> be relying on the community empowerment and accountability mechanisms that the
> CCWG is considering such as the ability to review of ICANN Board decisions on
> the IANA periodic review performance (PRF); approve or reject board decisions
> on PRF as well as the related creation of a stakeholder community / member
> group to trigger these kinds of abilities. As such the CWG wants to emphasize
> again the interlinkage and interdependence between the two groups and the need
> to continue close co-operation and regular information sharing.
> 
> 
> 
> • Review and redress mechanisms (in particular, relating to a 'fundamental
> bylaw' mechanism)
> 
> 
> 
> Response: The CWG is expected to recommend that a periodic review of the IANA
> functions is scheduled to take place no later than every 5 years and would
> operate in a manner analogous to an AOC review. As the CWG understands that
> the CCWG is working on incorporating other periodic reviews as mandated by the
> AoC, the CWG would like to know whether an IANA Periodic Review could be
> incorporated as part of those efforts. Further details on the mechanics of
> such a review are available and can be shared should the CCWG confirm that
> this is indeed something that can be incorporated as part of the CCWG’s
> efforts.
> 
> 
> 
> • Appeal mechanisms (especially with regard to ccTLD related issues)
> 
> 
> 
> Response: The CWG recommends that the CCWG should be mindful of the
> recommendations of the CWG in relation to an appeals mechanism for ccTLDs and
> the survey results that led to this recommendation which notes that ccTLDs may
> decide to develop their own appeals mechanism regarding re/delegation at a
> later date (post-transition). As such, any appeal mechanism developed by the
> CCWG should not cover ccTLD delegation / re-delegation issues as these are
> expected to be developed by the ccTLD community through the appropriate
> processes. However, the CWG does want to emphasize the importance and need for
> an appeal mechanism to cover any other issues that may involve IANA and notes
> that this is option is expected to be specifically called out as one of the
> possible escalation mechanisms  in the draft transition proposal.
> 
> 
> 
> <Portion de message joint.txt>_______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

Giovanni Seppia
External Relations Manager

EURid
Woluwelaan 150    
1831 Diegem - Belgium
TEL: +32 (0) 2 401 2750
MOB:+39 335 8141733
giovanni.seppia at eurid.eu
http://www.eurid.eu <http://www.eurid.eu/>

#2015euWA

Please consider the environment before printing this email.
<http://christmas2014.eurid.eu>

Disclaimer:
This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received
this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by
telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should
not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely
upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and
any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of EURid. While all care has been taken to avoid any known
viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for
presence of viruses.
Other languages:
English <http://www.eurid.eu/en/legal-disclaimer> Estonian
<http://www.eurid.eu/et/legal-disclaimer> Italian
<http://www.eurid.eu/it/legal-disclaimer> Maltese
<http://www.eurid.eu/mt/legal-disclaimer> Romanian
<http://www.eurid.eu/ro/legal-disclaimer> Swedish
<http://www.eurid.eu/sv/legal-disclaimer>
Czech <http://www.eurid.eu/cs/legal-disclaimer> Spanish
<http://www.eurid.eu/es/legal-disclaimer> Latvian
<http://www.eurid.eu/lv/legal-disclaimer> Dutch
<http://www.eurid.eu/nl/legal-disclaimer> Slovak
<http://www.eurid.eu/sk/legal-disclaimer> Greek
<http://www.eurid.eu/el/legal-disclaimer>
Danish <http://www.eurid.eu/da/legal-disclaimer> French
<http://www.eurid.eu/fr/legal-disclaimer> Lithuanian
<http://www.eurid.eu/lt/legal-disclaimer> Polish
<http://www.eurid.eu/pl/legal-disclaimer> Slovenian
<http://www.eurid.eu/sl/legal-disclaimer> Bulgarian
<http://www.eurid.eu/bg/legal-disclaimer>
German <http://www.eurid.eu/de/legal-disclaimer> Gaelic
<http://www.eurid.eu/ga/legal-disclaimer> Hungarian
<http://www.eurid.eu/hu/legal-disclaimer> Portuguese
<http://www.eurid.eu/pt/legal-disclaimer> Finnish
<http://www.eurid.eu/fi/legal-disclaimer> Croatian
<http://www.eurid.eu/hr/legal-disclaimer>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150415/b0f32ff9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2969 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150415/b0f32ff9/image001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150415/b0f32ff9/smime.p7s>