[CCWG-ACCT] Quality of our proposal will suffer from this pace that leaves no time for consideration and meaningful evaluation

Roelof Meijer Roelof.Meijer at sidn.nl
Thu Apr 16 12:28:35 UTC 2015


I couldn¹t agree more, very well put

Thanks,

Roelof




On 14-04-15 16:44, "Robin Gross" <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:

>It is important to remember that the transition does not happen until we
>are done.  That is the order of events.  Not the other way around.  We
>are not rushing to meet someone else's deadline because the transition
>cannot occur until we've got consensus and approval of the changes that
>must be made before it can occur.  Sometimes we forget that we are the
>driving force in this timeline.  Sometimes we think that we must rush to
>meet these dates, but that isn't how this process has actually been set
>up.   I agree we need to continue to work quickly, but not because there
>is a limited window in the next 2 weeks to come up a proposal, but
>because we have a window in the next 4-6 months, and we should take that
>time to get it right.
>
>Thanks,
>Robin
>
>
>On Apr 14, 2015, at 6:30 AM, Drazek, Keith wrote:
>
>> Eberhard,
>> 
>> I believe the contract WILL be extended.
>> 
>> I agree content and getting accountability right is paramount.
>> 
>> I also believe there is a limited window of opportunity to secure a
>>transition.
>> 
>> Keith
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Apr 14, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.NA> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>>> 
>>> It is a FUNDAMENTAL issue, are we approaching this right or wrong?
>>> 
>>> I think we did this wrong right from the start, and are doing this
>>> wrong. If we are getting this wrong, a transition would not achieve
>>>what
>>> we all want.
>>> 
>>> There is no deadline which would make the transition fail, they will
>>> just extend the contract.
>>> 
>>> We must not sacrifice content, under ANY circumstances.
>>> 
>>> el
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 2015-04-14 13:39, Drazek, Keith wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>> I am strongly in support of getting accountability reforms
>>>> "right," but I'm also sensitive to a possibly limited window of
>>>> opportunity to secure a transition of IANA stewardship.
>>> [...]
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
>>> el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
>>> PO Box 8421             \     /
>>> Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> 
>




More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list