[CCWG-ACCT] Notes-Recordings-Transcript links for Accountability Stress Tests Meeting #4 on 15 April

[Brenda Brewer]

Dear all, 

 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the Accountability Stress Tests Meeting #4 on 15 April
will be available here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52895714
<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52895714%20>  

 


Action Items


ACTION ITEM - Steve to refine paragraph on page 1

ACTION ITEM -Jonathan to recirculate explanatory note

ACTION ITEM - remove strike through  

ACTION ITEM - Read CWG input and incorporate any effect this may have on ST 21 as needed. 

ACTION ITEM - Cheryl to contact Bart Boswinkel/Bernie Turcotte to incorporate language 


Notes


Accountability Stress Tests WP Meeting #4 on 15 April

Link:  ST-WP Drafts - http://tinyurl.com/mye8o3e

These high-level notes are designed to help you navigate through content of the call and do not
substitute in any way the transcript.

 

P1 last paragraph will be edited. ST of interest to CWG will be added. 

ACTION ITEM - Steve to refine paragraph on page 1

Edward Morris' additional ST will be #26

STs # 3, 4, 29, 11, 27, 17 - Board Inaction: ability to spur the Board to make a decision in order
to trigger a reconsideration or IRP is not firmly established in any 
of the design powers and mechanisms yet. Outreach to legal on Board inaction has not led to formal
feedback. Suggestion that threaten Board of removal to solve for 
Board inaction is not a formal mechanism. Expanding on ATRT recommendation #9 language in the bylaws
might be sufficient to trigger the IRP and other 
review mechanisms that are being worked on in Work Party 2. Conversation with WP1 to ensure inducing
Board action is a community power. WP2 discussion 
about whether or not existing redress mechanisms could somehow be triggered by a failure to act. 

ACTION ITEM -Jonathan to recirculate explanatory note

Steve del Bianco flagged that Preserving AoC commitments in ICANN bylaws will be discussed in WP1

Suggestion that better to have Bylaw provision that forces Board  an accountability to the community
to respond to Advisory Committee formal advice.     - Advisory Committees would benefit from this.
Outreach to ACs might be needed. 

Community Veto  STs #3, 4, 19, 10, 20, 15

ACTION ITEM - remove strike through  

ST #18 GAC 

Discussion is pending. Some GAC support for ST recommendation.

Should more urgent issues come forward from WP1 - WP2, stress test 18 still needs discussion - would
cut back on 14 - 17 

 

GAO

Steve provided GAO with overview of STs

ST #21

Suggestion to amend ST 21 in light af CWG remarks concerning appeal mechanism and respect national
legislation on redelegation

ACTION ITEM - Read CWG input and incorporate any effect this may have on ST 21 as needed. 

Consider including reference to GAC principles 

ACTION ITEM - Cheryl to contact Bart Boswinkel/Bernie Turcotte to incorporate language 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150416/ea7b0291/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150416/ea7b0291/image001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150416/ea7b0291/smime.p7s>