[CCWG-ACCT] RES: Initial draft section 8 - work stream 2

[Greg Shatan]

Pedro,

First, your thanks are very much appreciated, and I thank you for them in
return.

Second, would you be so kind as to provide some of the possible
accountability limitations you refer to, or direct me to where they have
been identified? I would like to make sure that I understand the concern.

Thank you in advance.

Best regards,

Greg Shatan

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva <
pedro.ivo at itamaraty.gov.br> wrote:

> Dear CCWG-Colleagues,
>
> I suggest the following point be included:
>
> - Alternative options for ICANN's jurisdiction (understood as 'place of
> legal establishment') based on possible accountability limitations related
> to the current jurisdiction of the Corporation (identified during WS1);
>
> I assume the first item ("enhancements to ICANN's accountability based on
> the law(s) applicable to its actions") of the proposed WS2 list may also
> refer to jurisdiction, but I believe a clear reference to the term and to
> what we discussed in Istanbul is more adequate.
>
> Note: I take the opportunity to thank Greg Shatan for his useful
> distinction of the various meanings associated with the term 'jurisdiction'.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Secretário Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva
> Divisão da Sociedade da Informação (DI)
> Ministério das Relações Exteriores - Brasil
> T: + 55 61 2030-6609
>
> Secretary Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva
> Division of Information Society (DI)
> Ministry of External Relations - Brazil
> T: + 55 61 2030-6609
>
>
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] Em nome de Mathieu Weill
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 16 de abril de 2015 10:58
> Para: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> Assunto: [CCWG-ACCT] Initial draft section 8 - work stream 2
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> As part of our planned report structure for public comment, section 8 is
> planned to address work stream 2 : what items would be considered and how
> would we ensure commitment that they will indeed be addressed ? The task of
> assembling a draft was assigned to the co-chairs in Istanbul.
>
> With precious help from staff, we are circulating this initial draft,
> building on the idea of a transitional article in the Bylaws, which seemed
> to get traction in Istanbul. The list of items is very tentative.
>
> the status of the document is an Initial draft. Amendments sent before
> Friday 17 Apr 15.00 UTC will be incorporated into the “freeze period”
> document. And of course, full and detailed review will be on the agenda of
> our intense work days (so this is NOT an urgent last call).
>
> Thanks for your consideration,
>
> --
> *****************************
> Mathieu WEILL
> AFNIC - directeur général
> Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
> mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> Twitter : @mathieuweill
> *****************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150416/b4f862d3/attachment.html>