[CCWG-ACCT] RES: RES: Initial draft section 8 - work stream 2
Mathieu Weill
mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Fri Apr 17 07:56:09 UTC 2015
Dear Colleagues,
Thank you for sharing these inputs and kicking off this discussion. This
is a bit like a "chicken and egg" issue because, of course we need to be
quite specific on the issues we intend to address, but as long as we
don't have our WS1 proposals fully reviewed by legal advisors (and I'm
aware of the questions that were raised by Pedro to the legal group) it
is difficult to be specific.
I will take note of both comments in the draft, and will flag as a
discussion point for the CCWG to consider.
best
Mathieu
Le 17/04/2015 02:21, Paul Rosenzweig a écrit :
>
> Why would we list in WS2 an inquiry into possible problems we have not
> yet identified and of which we are not yet aware? We might as well
> list “possible adverse action by the GAC” or “possible default by
> ICANN on its debt” or thousands of other possibilities that are
> evanescent and indeterminate. I agree, of course, that IF our inquiry
> suggests a real problem it would be appropriate to place it on the WS2
> agenda. But identifying as agenda item a contingent possibility of
> indeterminate provenance simply because of its political salience is,
> I respectfully submit, inadmissible. WS2 is filled enough with
> problems and issues we actually know exist … we shouldn’t put down
> placeholders for every issue that some consider of possible merit.
>
> Paul
>
> Paul Rosenzweig
>
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
> <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
>
> O: +1 (202) 547-0660
>
> M: +1 (202) 329-9650
>
> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
>
> Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
>
> Link to my PGP Key
> <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9>
>
> <http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us15/register?utm_source=inhouse&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=signature-us2015>
>
> *From:* Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva [mailto:pedro.ivo at itamaraty.gov.br]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 16, 2015 5:12 PM
> *To:* 'Greg Shatan'
> *Cc:* accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CCWG-ACCT] RES: RES: Initial draft section 8 - work stream 2
>
> Dear Greg,
>
> Thank you for the email.
>
> We have just started to interact with the legal firms and are slowly
> being acquainted with their advice. In the course of the next
> weeks/months I believe we will be able to better identify whether
> there are limitations or not regarding ICANN's current jurisdiction.
> This is why I wrote "*_possible_* accountability limitations".
>
> Maybe the text at the end of the sentence is a bit misleading, but I
> didn't mean they have been already identified. This is still work in
> progress.
>
> Regards,
>
> Secretário Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva
>
> Divisão da Sociedade da Informação (DI)
>
> Ministério das Relações Exteriores - Brasil
>
> T: + 55 61 2030-6609
>
> Secretary Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva
>
> Division of Information Society (DI)
>
> Ministry of External Relations - Brazil
>
> T: + 55 61 2030-6609
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com]
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 16 de abril de 2015 18:02
> Para: Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva
> Cc: Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr <mailto:Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr>;
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Assunto: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] RES: Initial draft section 8 - work stream 2
>
> Pedro,
>
> First, your thanks are very much appreciated, and I thank you for them
> in return.
>
> Second, would you be so kind as to provide some of the possible
> accountability limitations you refer to, or direct me to where they
> have been identified? I would like to make sure that I understand the
> concern.
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Greg Shatan
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva
> <pedro.ivo at itamaraty.gov.br <mailto:pedro.ivo at itamaraty.gov.br>> wrote:
>
> Dear CCWG-Colleagues,
>
> I suggest the following point be included:
>
> - Alternative options for ICANN's jurisdiction
> (understood as 'place of legal establishment') based on possible
> accountability limitations related to the current jurisdiction of the
> Corporation (identified during WS1);
>
> I assume the first item ("enhancements to ICANN's
> accountability based on the law(s) applicable to its actions") of the
> proposed WS2 list may also refer to jurisdiction, but I believe a
> clear reference to the term and to what we discussed in Istanbul is
> more adequate.
>
> Note: I take the opportunity to thank Greg Shatan for
> his useful distinction of the various meanings associated with the
> term 'jurisdiction'.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Secretário Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva
>
> Divisão da Sociedade da Informação (DI)
>
> Ministério das Relações Exteriores - Brasil
>
> T: + 55 61 2030-6609 <tel:%2B%2055%2061%202030-6609>
>
> Secretary Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva
>
> Division of Information Society (DI)
>
> Ministry of External Relations - Brazil
>
> T: + 55 61 2030-6609 <tel:%2B%2055%2061%202030-6609>
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
>
> De: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] Em nome de
> Mathieu Weill
>
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 16 de abril de 2015 10:58
>
> Para: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>
> Assunto: [CCWG-ACCT] Initial draft section 8 - work stream 2
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> As part of our planned report structure for public
> comment, section 8 is planned to address work stream 2 : what items
> would be considered and how would we ensure commitment that they will
> indeed be addressed ? The task of assembling a draft was assigned to
> the co-chairs in Istanbul.
>
> With precious help from staff, we are circulating this
> initial draft, building on the idea of a transitional article in the
> Bylaws, which seemed to get traction in Istanbul. The list of items is
> very tentative.
>
> the status of the document is an Initial draft.
> Amendments sent before Friday 17 Apr 15.00 UTC will be incorporated
> into the “freeze period”
>
> document. And of course, full and detailed review will be on the
> agenda of our intense work days (so this is NOT an urgent last call).
>
> Thanks for your consideration,
>
> --
>
> *****************************
>
> Mathieu WEILL
>
> AFNIC - directeur général
>
> Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
> <tel:%2B33%201%2039%2030%2083%2006>
>
> mathieu.weill at afnic.fr <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
>
> Twitter : @mathieuweill
>
> *****************************
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150417/184365a5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 14796 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150417/184365a5/attachment.jpe>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list