[CCWG-ACCT] Frozen Draft Report
Dr Eberhard Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Mon Apr 20 14:12:08 UTC 2015
Dear Co-Chairs,
I remain confused by Thomas' advice.
>From the charter:
The Chair(s) shall be responsible for designating each
position as having one of the following designations:
a) Full Consensus - a position where no minority disagrees;
identified by an absence of objection
b) Consensus - a position where a small minority disagrees,
but most agree
I quite doubt that we shall need advice from our legal SubTeam what
EACH POSITION means.
[...] In the absence of Full Consensus, the Chair(s) should
allow for the submission of minority viewpoint(s) and these,
along with the consensus view, shall be included in the
report. [...]
I quite doubt that we shall need advice from our legal SubTeam whether
an interim report is a report.
Oh, this reminds me, I want to join the Legal SubTeam.
greetings, el
On 2015-04-20 14:54, Thomas Rickert wrote:
> Dear Eberhard,
> it is not foreseen in our charter to have minority views for other
> scenarios than the consensus recommendations. I suggest you use the
> public comment period to voice your concerns or indicate your preference
> where our report is providing options as I am sure many of the
> colleagues in the CCWG and their respective groups will do.
>
> Thomas
>
> ---
> rickert.net <http://rickert.net>
[...]
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ /
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list