[CCWG-ACCT] Frozen Draft Report

Thomas Rickert rickert at anwaelte.de
Mon Apr 20 14:46:33 UTC 2015


Dear Kavouss,
we will make unambiguously clear that we are not presenting a consensus position but that we are soliciting input from the community with this report we are currently preparing. Even more so, the report will likely present different options that have been discussed in the CCWG or in sub-teams, which makes it clear that the group has not made its conclusions yet. 

Kind regards,
Thomas

---
rickert.net


> Am 20.04.2015 um 16:34 schrieb Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:
> 
> Thomas
> It is a pity that there is no opportunity that minority  from formal members of CCWG , s views could not be reflected in the report which could  give the wrong impression that the output represent consensus.
> In ICG we have the  opportunity to include minority views after several chair,s attempt ti resolve that   
> Having said that it is necessary to indicate in the output dic.'that it does not represent the consensus
> Kavouss    
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 20 Apr 2015, at 15:54, Thomas Rickert <rickert at anwaelte.de> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Eberhard,
>> it is not foreseen in our charter to have minority views for other scenarios than the consensus recommendations. I suggest you use the public comment period to voice your concerns or indicate your preference where our report is providing options as I am sure many of the colleagues in the CCWG and their respective groups will do.
>> 
>> Thomas
>> 
>> ---
>> rickert.net
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 20.04.2015 um 15:42 schrieb Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na>:
>>> 
>>> Dear Co-Chairs
>>> 
>>> indeed we do not have Consensus on the interim findings, so I intend to provide a minority viewpoint on the interim findings for public comment.
>>> 
>>> el 
>>> -- 
>>> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 20, 2015, at 14:35, Thomas Rickert <rickert at anwaelte.de> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear Eberhard,
>>>> please note that our group has not reached a consensus yet. As mentioned on numerous occasions during our calls, we plan to present our interim findings to the community and invite the community to comment. 
>>>> 
>>>> The group will be alerted if and when we are asking for support with or objections to a set of recommendations that could form the consensus of the group. You will also be able to chime in when such final report is prepared for publication.   
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Thomas
>>>> 
>>>> ---
>>>> rickert.net
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 18.04.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>>>>> 
>>>>> please advise how I will be able to attach my dissenting minority report (objecting against process and (lack of) substance) so it can be publicly commented on.
>>>>> 
>>>>> greetings, el
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 18, 2015, at 10:10, Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> All, 
>>>>>> please find attached the draft report with the input we got from the sub-teams. They can also be found at https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Draft+Report. This is the frozen version of the document until our intensive two work days. Please note that you know most of the information already. We suggest you focus on the recommendations of WP1 and WP2, since the introductory part is primarily narrative and giving context. The stress test have been discussed quite extensively already. We are working on summaries or tables to make it easier for you to digest the information, but we wanted to get the frozen draft report out to you as soon as possible. 
>>>>>> Such additional materials will be worked on in collaboration with the rapporteurs to ensure that we provide information in a more handy while not misrepresenting interim work results.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Let us also use this opportunity to thank all of you, our fabulous rapporteurs and staff for their outstanding work and commitment.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kindest regards,
>>>>>> León, Mathieu and Thomas
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <Appendices - 17 April.pdf>
>>>>>> <CCWG-Report Draft v1.1.pdf>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150420/c02e0d6d/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list