[CCWG-ACCT] RES: Fwd: draft proposal for AoC section 8 - for our next call

[Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva]

Dear Steve,



Thanks for the proposal.



I would rephrase the following sentence "The CCWG is considering whether bylaws Article 18 Section 1 should be among the bylaws sections listed as “Fundamental Bylaws”, which would thereby require positive approval by Members/Designators."



to the following, just to be clear we are considering two options:



"The CCWG is considering whether bylaws Article 18 Section 1 should keep its current status or be among the bylaws sections listed as “Fundamental Bylaws”. In the latter case, any changes to it  would require positive approval by Members/Designators.  "



Note: native speakers (and others) should feel free to optimize the language.



Regards,





Secretário Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva

Divisão da Sociedade da Informação (DI)

Ministério das Relações Exteriores - Brasil

T: + 55 61 2030-6609



Secretary Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva

Division of Information Society (DI)

Ministry of External Relations - Brazil

T: + 55 61 2030-6609





-----Mensagem original-----
De: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] Em nome de Steve DelBianco
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 24 de abril de 2015 12:38
Para: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Assunto: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: draft proposal for AoC section 8 - for our next call





Per Mathieu's request, here is a one page summary of proposed way to deal with AoC section 8.  I tried to reflect suggestions from our last call.



Look forward to discussion.









​ —​

Steve DelBianco



Executive Director

NetChoice

http://www.NetChoice.org <http://www.netchoice.org/>  and  http://blog.netchoice.org <http://blog.netchoice.org/>

+1.703.615.6206






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150424/603e60b3/attachment.html>