[CCWG-ACCT] Proposed text to add to public comment document

Tijani BEN JEMAA tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org.tn
Thu Apr 30 13:22:27 UTC 2015


It’s fine for me Thomas.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tijani BEN JEMAA

Executive Director

Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)

Phone:  + 216 41 649 605

Mobile: + 216 98 330 114

Fax:       + 216 70 853 376

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

 

De : accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] De la part de Thomas Rickert
Envoyé : jeudi 30 avril 2015 11:45
À : Drazek, Keith
Cc : Accountability Cross Community
Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Proposed text to add to public comment document

 

All, 

we had agreed earlier today to just delete the second half of the sentence, so in my view, the „private sector“ term is gone.

 

see para 122 2.f.- the sentence would now read:

 

a.     . It is therefore more closely aligned with the existing structure of ICANN.





and we deleted:

 and in keeping ICANN rooted in the private sector. 

 

I hope that helps,

Thomas

 

 

 

Am 30.04.2015 um 12:31 schrieb Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>:

 

I recall we had a lengthy discussion on the term "private sector" during our chartering process for the CCWG. It is not meant to exclude users or governments from participation. In this context, it is used to clarify that the management of assigned names and numbers is "not a governmental function."

 

Regards,

Keith

 


On Apr 30, 2015, at 12:42 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

I have a real problem with this. 

There is no doubt that the private sector has been a major and influential component since its inception, but it is similarly true that governments and users (albeit in varying models) have been an integral component of ICANN. Our roles may be different, but our roots go as deep, and the import of the public interest in ICANN cannot and should not be swept under the carpet.

Alan

At 28/04/2015 08:05 PM, Robin Gross wrote:



As requested in our call today, below is proposed text for various parts of the draft public comment document.

Section 6.6.1.2
p. 54 add to end of (f):
"It is therefore more closely aligned with the existing structure of ICANN and in keeping ICANN rooted in the private sector."

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

 



---
Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150430/2a36ba71/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list