[CCWG-ACCT] Community Mechanism for Freeze

[Robin Gross]

Why did the dissenting views on 5A get moved to a footnote?  They were in the body of the text of the report in the versions of this document before.  Had they been in a footnote before I would have objected.  I don't believe it is appropriate to make such a significant change prejudicing minority views after the document is supposedly locked.  We were told the document was locked, and yet this change was made with no opportunity to object.  Therefore I object now and request the text get moved back to the body of the report as it was in all the previous drafts we reviewed.

Thank you,
Robin


On Aug 1, 2015, at 5:53 PM, Grace Abuhamad wrote:

> Dear all, 
> 
> Here is the updated community mechanism document for the freeze. This includes the dissenting opinions text that Robin and Greg clarified. 
> 
> Best, 
> Grace
> <Community Mechanism_0108.docx><Community Mechanism_0108_redline.docx><Community Mechanism_0108_redline.pdf><Community Mechanism_0108.pdf>_______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150801/830277d2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150801/830277d2/signature.asc>