[CCWG-ACCT] Minority Statements

[Seun Ojedeji]

I am yet to get the scenario where absent would be applicable here. I can
understand possibility of having abstain as an option but not absent.

Regards
On 1 Aug 2015 11:49 pm, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> On a more serious note, voting in the Mechanism does not take place in a
> meeting, so there should be no
> ​ proxy voting.
>
> Greg​
>
>
> On Saturday, August 1, 2015, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na> wrote:
>
>> s/nut/but/
>>
>> spellchecker on the iPhone :-)-O
>>
>> el
>>
>> On 2015-08-01 22:04 , Greg Shatan wrote:
>> > I assume "nut voting" is a typo.
>> >
>> > But the other possibilities are interesting to consider.
>> >
>> > On Saturday, August 1, 2015, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na
>> > <mailto:el at lisse.na>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     What about
>> >
>> >     not present nut voting (by proxy)?
>> >
>> >     el
>> >
>> >     --
>> [...]
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
>> el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
>> PO Box 8421             \     /
>> Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150802/146d4627/attachment.html>