[CCWG-ACCT] Regarding possible face-to-face meeting in LA

[Alan Greenberg]

I believe a f2f meeting WOULD be useful, but I 
could not attend on the currently suggested dates.

Alan

At 26/08/2015 06:04 PM, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
>Note that the Los Angeles dates are not locked 
>in ­ I iimagine they could be moved +/- a few days.
>
>Also the CCWG could decide to have a 
>face-to-face meeting in LA for its own purposes 
>in Sept.   The benefit is that meeting 
>facilities, and staff are available in that time 
>frame,  The CCWG could decide that there is no 
>need to actually have any separate session with 
>the Board during its face-to-face meeting, but 
>Board members are at least likely to sit in the 
>room and listen to the CCWG discussions in that time frame.
>
>We are just trying to plan out some dates for 
>phone calls and face-to-face sessions - and the 
>content of those calls and sessions will evolve in the next few weeks.
>
>Regards,
>Bruce Tonkin
>
>_______________________________________________ 
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list 
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org 
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community