[CCWG-ACCT] Resolution of Mission Language related to regulation and contract
Kavouss Arasteh
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Sat Dec 12 08:23:25 UTC 2015
Dear Rosemary,
Dear Leon
Dear All,
Before certifying question to be
studied , one need to verify the
practicality and workability of the
study.
Issue 1
How many PICs have been
received? Perhaps some 500
Issue 2
How many were expected
to have been received? Perhaps
About 1930, equal to the No.
of strings gTLDs
Issue 3
How many supplementary PICs
Were submitted by applicants? No
Real statistics
Issue 4
Are there any typical or some
typical PIC or PICs available?
Issue 5
What the meaning of term
"typical PIC "in legal language?
Issue 6
Does a typical PIC, if any, could
cover the objectives of PIC in
general legal terms?
I think we are hijacked by a
question raised which would be
Impractical to study and impractical
to infer ant thing from that.
Now, should we not DROP the
Question?
Regards
Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
> On 12 Dec 2015, at 00:50, Rosemary E. Fei <rfei at adlercolvin.com> wrote:
>
> How large is the universe of existing PICs? Perhaps someone on the CCWG could provide us with a representative sampling of existing PICs, and we can then review them and draw our own conclusions about what’s a “typical” provision?
>
> Rosemary
>
> Rosemary E. Fei
> Adler & Colvin
> 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1220
> San Francisco, CA 94104
> 415/421-7555 (phone)
> 415/421-0712 (fax)
> rfei at adlercolvin.com
> www.adlercolvin.com
>
> _____________________________
> Adler & Colvin is a San Francisco Green Business certified by the City and County of San Francisco. Please consider the environment before you print this email.
>
> From: Malcolm Hutty [mailto:malcolm at linx.net]
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 3:34 PM
> To: Holly Gregory
> Cc: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; ACCT-Staff (acct-staff at icann.org); Thomas Rickert; Accountability Cross Community
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Resolution of Mission Language related to regulation and contract
>
>
>
> On 11 Dec 2015, at 22:15, Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory at sidley.com> wrote:
>
> We will need information on the kind of provisions that PICs have typically included. Could ICANN legal provide that information to us?
>
> And therein lies the rub.
>
> I think CCWG members are likely to have differing views as to what should be considered "typical" and what aberrant. Nor would I consider ICANN legal a neutral advisor to you on this, if it were making any kind of qualitative judgement.
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151212/e5966f25/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list