[CCWG-ACCT] FW: Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations

[Bruce Tonkin]

OK maybe re-stated:

ICANN is not a regulator, nor should it attempt to control content through its contracts


-----Original Message-----
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, 17 December 2015 6:23 AM
To: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] FW: Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations



On 16-Dec-15 05:27, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> (2) ICANN is not a regulator, and does not regulate content through these contracts.

doesn't this just mean it is not a content regulator without indicating that it is not a regulator in any other aspect of the role?

avri

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community