[CCWG-ACCT] Requirements based on latest discussions

Tue Feb 3 10:13:18 UTC 2015

Dear Kavouss, Colleagues,

Thank you for your comments and for raising additional points to consider.

I have edited the wiki document to reflect these comments.
https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Recap+of+latest+requirements+mentioned+on+the+CCWG+accountability+list 

best
Mathieu

Le 30/01/2015 23:28, Kavouss Arasteh a écrit :
>
> Recap of latest requirements mentioned on the CCWG accountability list
>
> *Type of requirement*
>
> 	
>
> *Requirement or issue to be considered*
>
> Comments by Kavoouss
>
> 	
>
> *Work party*
>
> Decision making
>
> 	
>
> Footing /Weights for SO/ACs ?
>
> We need to examine the required footing. I do not see that we have 
> reach any agreement on equal footing between SO/AC Include stakeholder 
> groups in decision making ?
>
> Who are stakeholders ? Are we referring to SO /AC?
>
> 	
>
> WP1 / WP2
>
> Decision making
>
> 	
>
> Vote based on SO/AC internal processes
>
> We need to normalized these different internal procedure if we want to 
> use it outside SO/AC
>
> 	
>
> WP1
>
> Decision making
>
> 	
>
> Based on consensus ? Supermajority ?
>
> As a General Rules, we need to look for consensus, in rare and 
> exceptional cases, Voting.
>
> Supermajority has different criteris, 2/3, 374 or 4/5
>
> 	
>
> WP1
>
> Independence
>
> 	
>
> Conditions of independence with regards to the Board (not having been 
> part of Board, or being barred from joining for several years)
>
> Not having been part of Board for the last v YEARS at the time of 
> decision making
>
> 	
>
> WP1 / WP2
>
> Mediation
>
> 	
>
> Mediation as first step of review / redress mechanism
>
> Please specify between which entities we need mediation?
>
> 	
>
> WP2
>
> Mediation
>
> 	
>
> Designation of Ombudsman to conduct mediation
>
> Ombudsman is used in the current situation. We have not seriously 
> discussed why we need an individual with such an authority
>
> 	
>
> WP2
>
> Membership
>
> 	
>
> Is it free of cost ?
>
> We need to be careful not proposing any criteria which contradict the 
> inclusiveness
>
> 	
>
> WP1
>
> Oversight accountability
>
> 	
>
> Ability for the respective groups to recall their delegate or member
>
> Whart do we mean by recall?
>
> Hold a meeting, hold an assembly ?
>
> 	
>
> WP1
>
> Oversight Accountability
>
> 	
>
> Is it a paid or unpaid position ?
>
> We should be careful to make every thing no profit.
>
> Participation costs Yes , Salary , be careful of competition and 
> unintended consequences
>
> 	
>
> WP1
>
> Scope
>
> 	
>
> Type(s) of Board decisions to be submitted to prior approval, or that 
> could be overturned
>
> We need to be careful, on the one hand, not to put any unnessary 
> obstacle for day-to-day functioning, and on the otherhand, not make 
> the Board totally authoritative. Thuis we have to establish some very 
> general criteria for decisions to be submitted to prior approval, or 
> that could be overturned i ,
>
> 	
>
> WP1
>
> Scope
>
> 	
>
> List of rights of “members” or “delegates”
>
> In the exercise of their duties, the members/ delgates ( elected or 
> appointed ) shall serve, not as representing their respective 
> communities , affiliated entities nor a region, but as custodians of 
> an international public trust. In particular, each member/delegate 
> shall refrain from intervening in decisions directly concerning the 
> member’s / delegate,sown entities to which she or he is affiliated
>
> No member / derlegate shall request or receive instructions relating 
> to the exercise of her/ his duties for the for the international / 
> global community ( ties ) from any government , civil society, private 
> sector, technical community and Acadenmic or an affiliated thereof, or 
> from any public or private organization or person. Members/ delgates 
> shall refrain from taking any action or from participating in any 
> decision which may be incompatible with their status defined above.
>
> 	
>
> WP1
>
>
> 2015-01-30 18:34 GMT+01:00 Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr 
> <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>:
>
>     Dear Colleagues,
>
>     Over the last 10 days, several threads took place discussing
>     member or delegate options, including very relevant insights and
>     ideas. At the same time, our Work Parties 1 & 2 are just getting
>     formed, so I felt we were running the risk of not making the most
>     of these discussions.
>
>     I have created a wiki page in an attemps to sum up, in terms of
>     requirements, the ideas that were exchanged in these threads, and
>     that should form an input to WP1 & WP2. I have probably missed
>     some of the ideas exchanged, and maybe was not able to capture
>     some of these right.
>
>     But I would suggest we try to elaborate on this, and then hand
>     this on to the WPs. Please feel free to add & comment.
>
>     This is the link to the doc : https://community.icann.org/x/JwQdAw
>
>     Best,
>
>     -- 
>     *****************************
>     Mathieu WEILL
>     AFNIC - directeur général
>     Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06 <tel:%2B33%201%2039%2030%2083%2006>
>     mathieu.weill at afnic.fr <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
>     Twitter : @mathieuweill
>     *****************************
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>

-- 
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150203/8817ce37/attachment.html>