[CCWG-ACCT] U.S. Senate Resolution 71
Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
Sat Feb 7 14:36:04 UTC 2015
With respect Samantha, I think that understates the comparative significance
of this, at least here in the US. To be absolutely sure, this is completely
non-binding. As such it has no legal effect at all. None. On that you are
correct.
But in my experience it is more than merely "indicative of a level of
interest." Typically (and, in this case) the text of the "opinion" is
carefully vetted by Senate staff before passage. This resolution could not
have passed without the unanimous agreement of the Senate - a single
objection would have derailed it.
Now, also to be sure, because it is non-binding and of no legal effect, some
Senators may have chosen not to exercise their veto over the language as a
matter of comity or political calculation (or perhaps even horse-trading
regarding another matter). So we should not read this as reflecting a
complete and definitive expression of a Senatorial view on the substance
expressed - those who object may have been simply waiting for a different
time to express their views.
But also clearly, those who authored the resolution were using it as a
vehicle not just to signal that they were interested in the topic generally
but to express (mostly to the NTIA and the Obama Administration) their
substantive preferences. They aim to influence NTIA's actions and,
derivatively, to influence ICANN. In both those ends they may or may not
succeed. I especially doubt that non-Americans involved in this process will
give the Senate resolution any great weight.
But I am reasonably confident that the NTIA, at least, is reviewing the text
of this resolution with a reasonable degree of care and as a basis for
further discussions and consultation with a body who has a moderately high
degree of influence on its operations and decision making.
This, of course, is just my view - I can't speak for the NTIA. But I
suspect they are not dismissing this resolution as merely an expression of
interest in the process generally, without substantive import.
I trust you are all enjoying Singapore.
Cheers
Paul
**NOTE: OUR NEW ADDRESS -- EFFECTIVE 12/15/14 ***
509 C St. NE
Washington, DC 20002
Paul Rosenzweig
<mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
Skype: +1 (202) 738-1739 or paul.rosenzweig1066
<http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=articl
e&id=19&Itemid=9> Link to my PGP Key
From: Drazek, Keith [mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 7, 2015 3:05 AM
To: Samantha Eisner; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] U.S. Senate Resolution 71
Thanks Sam, that is correct. A good and helpful clarification.
Best,
Keith
From: Samantha Eisner [mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2015 4:03 PM
To: Drazek, Keith; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] U.S. Senate Resolution 71
Thanks Keith. For our non-US colleagues, this is a "Sense of the Senate"
resolution which expresses an opinion only and, as such, is not binding. So
while it's indicative of the level of interest in the CCWG's work, this
resolution should not be read as establishing new criteria or requirements
for the ultimate proposal.
Best,
Sam
From: <Drazek>, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com> >
Date: Saturday, February 7, 2015 at 3:30 PM
To: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org> "
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org> >
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] U.S. Senate Resolution 71
Hi all,
FYI, the U.S. Senate passed the following resolution on February 5. This is
relevant to the work of the Accountability CCWG.
The "Designation" section is particularly note-worthy.
Best,
Keith
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/71/text
[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[S. Res. 71 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]
114th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 71
Designating the week of February 8 through February 14, 2015, as
``Internet Governance Awareness Week''.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
February 5, 2015
Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Warner, Mr. Coons, and Mr.
Inhofe) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and
agreed to
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Designating the week of February 8 through February 14, 2015, as
``Internet Governance Awareness Week''.
Whereas the United States remains committed to the multistakeholder model of
Internet governance, in which the private sector works in
collaboration
with civil society, governments, and technical experts in a
consensus
fashion;
Whereas the United States has, through its stewardship of key Internet
domain
name functions, maintained an important role in the protection of
the
Internet as presently constituted;
Whereas on March 14, 2014, the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (referred to in this preamble as the ``NTIA'')
announced
its intent to transition these key Internet domain name functions to
the
global multistakeholder community;
Whereas the transition process demonstrates that the United States supports
and
is committed to the multistakeholder model of Internet governance;
Whereas the NTIA has asked the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers (referred to in this preamble as ``ICANN'') to convene
global
stakeholders to develop a proposal to transition the current role
played
by the NTIA in the coordination of the Internet's domain name system
(referred to in this preamble as the ``DNS'');
Whereas the NTIA has stated that there is no deadline for the transition,
and
that the transition proposal must have broad community support and
must--
(1) support and enhance the multistakeholder model;
(2) maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet
DNS;
(3) meet the needs and expectations of the global customers and
partners of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority; and
(4) maintain the openness of the Internet;
Whereas the NTIA has also stated that it will not accept a proposal that
replaces the NTIA with a government-led or an inter-governmental
organization, a position that is consistent with S. Con. Res. 50
(112\th\ Congress), a concurrent resolution that was unanimously
passed
by the Senate and the House of Representatives in 2012 and supported
``the consistent and unequivocal policy of the United States to
promote
a global Internet free from government control and preserve and
advance
the successful multistakeholder model that governs the Internet
today'';
Whereas ICANN will be holding its next global meeting, ICANN 52, in
Singapore
between February 8 and February 12, 2015; and
Whereas designating the week of February 8 through February 14, 2015, as
``Internet Governance Awareness Week'' will encourage the
participants
at ICANN 52 to focus on developing key ICANN accountability
principles
for the protection of the global Internet: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
The Senate designates the week of February 8 through February 14,
2015, as ``Internet Governance Awareness Week'' to--
(1) increase public awareness regarding the March 14, 2014
announcement by the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (referred to in this resolving clause as the
``NTIA'') declaring the intention of the NTIA to transition the
stewardship of the functions of the Internet Assigned Numbers
Authority to the global multistakeholder community;
(2) encourage public education about the importance of this
transition process; and
(3) call the attention of the participants at the next
global meeting of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
and Numbers (referred to in this resolving clause as ``ICANN'')
to the importance of designing accountability and governance
reforms to best prepare ICANN for executing the
responsibilities that it may receive under any transition of
the stewardship of the functions of the Internet Assigned
Numbers Authority, including reforms that would--
(A) insist that the domain name system continues to
function as part of a secure, stable, resilient,
single, decentralized, open, and interoperable
Internet;
(B) ensure a form of stewardship and accountability
that is based on the separation of the functions of
policy-making, policy implementation, and, as needed,
independent adjudication or arbitration for dispute
resolution;
(C) limit and maintain ICANN authority to matters
that pertain to the coordination of Internet unique
identifiers, and limit each function to those rights,
responsibilities, and authorities that have been
explicitly assigned;
(D) protect ICANN from undue influence or capture
by one or more governments or multilateral or
intergovernmental organizations, or a single set of
other commercial or noncommercial stakeholders;
(E) maintain the commitment of ICANN for final
action regarding key policy decisions to demonstrate
broad support by the community of ICANN stakeholders;
(F) reinforce and expand transparency and
accountability measures to ensure community access to
ICANN documents and records; and
(G) ensure that, prior to the execution of the
transition of the stewardship of the functions of the
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, each of the
foregoing elements of such proposal is adopted and made
effective by ICANN through incorporation in its
articles of incorporation and by-laws, as needed, and
subject to independent adjudication or arbitration for
dispute resolution, as appropriate.
SEC. 2. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Nothing in this resolution shall be construed as congressional
approval of any proposal by ICANN to transition the stewardship of the
functions of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority to the global
multistakeholder community.
"This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as
attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, notify sender immediately and delete this message immediately."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150207/14b48ae0/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list