[CCWG-ACCT] Responses to questions from Jones Day

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

Phil,

opinions of dependent lawyers are as interesting as the ones of
independent ones :-)-O

el

On 2015-02-08 11:48 , Jordan Carter wrote:
> Phil, yes - the CCWG agreed with that in Frankfurt. It was felt it might
> be helpful to understand the view of the company and its representatives
> as well as an independent view, if I recall correctly.
> Jordan
> 
> On 8 February 2015 at 11:36, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com
> <mailto:psc at vlaw-dc.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Jones Day cannot be regarded as an objective and neutral source of
>     legal advice or opinions on anything related to ICANN. Indeed, any
>     statement made by Jones Day must be regarded as the views of ICANN,
>     its long-standing client.
> 
>     Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
> 
>     Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
>     Virtualaw LLC
>     1155 F Street, NW. Suite 1050
>     Washington, DC 20004
>     202-559-8597/Direct
>     202-559-8750/Fax
>     202-255-6172/Cell
>     Twitter: @VLawDC
> 
>     "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
>     *From: *Drazek, Keith
>     *Sent: *Sunday, February 8, 2015 11:14 AM
>     *To: *León Felipe Sánchez Ambía
>     *Cc: *CCWG Accountability
>     *Subject: *Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Responses to questions from Jones Day
> 
> 
>     Leon, 
> 
>     Do I understand you correctly that Jones Day developed both the
>     questions and the answers? Did the CCWG request this?
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Keith
> 
>     Sent from my iPhone
> 
>     On Feb 8, 2015, at 10:18 AM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía
>     <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>> wrote:
> 
>>     Dear all,
>>
>>     Please find attached the responses from Jones Day for questions
>>     prepared by Kevin Espinola. I would like to ask you to please
>>     review the document so we can further discuss it in our session
>>     tomorrow.
>>
>>     I would also like to remind the group that this is a first step
>>     which runs parallel to what the legal sub-team is doing in
>>     coordination with the CWG “legal client”. The aim is to have this
>>     responses reviewed by the legal sub-team as well as by the larger
>>     CCWG so we can determine how to better validate this responses
>>     with the external legal advisors when we engage with said external
>>     advice.
>>
>>     I look forward to a fruitful session with all of you.
>>
>>     Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>>     León
>>
>>
>>     <Accountability Questions for CCWG - from Jones Day.pdf>
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jordan Carter
> 
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
> 
> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
> jordan at internetnz.net.nz <mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
> Skype: jordancarter
> 
> /To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential./
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>