[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG list summary, Jan 30 to Feb 5
Edward Morris
egmorris1 at toast.net
Tue Feb 17 21:43:12 UTC 2015
I'm a bit confused Tijani.
First, you said you didn't remember the suggestion and now you state the suggestion had no support. As I wasn't able to be in Frankfurt I would appreciate clarification of the status of this worthy idea. I'm personally not a big fan of the generic term "public interest", finding that in practice "public interest" usually morphs into "personal interest": that is, "the public it is I". I realise that creation of a consensus definition of the public interest is called for in the draft 5 year OP but I do find Robin's idea to be worthy of discussion by the wider WG and thank staff for including it in the summary document.
Best,
Ed
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 17, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org.tn> wrote:
>
> Yes you did in Frankfurt, and there was no support to your suggestion.
>
> The “public interest” or the “benefit of the public, not just in the interests of a particular set of stakeholders” had a large support as part of the “CCWG Accountability – Problem definition” document (purposes of ICANN’s accountability, d.)
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tijani BEN JEMAA
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
> Phone: + 216 41 649 605
> Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
> Fax: + 216 70 853 376
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> De : Robin Gross [mailto:robin at ipjustice.org]
> Envoyé : mardi 17 février 2015 18:40
> À : Tijani BEN JEMAA
> Cc : 'Adam Peake'; 'Accountability Cross Community'
> Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG list summary, Jan 30 to Feb 5
>
> Yes, I made this suggestion.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:
>
>
> Dear Adam,
>
> I may have missed some of the mails exchanged but I don’t remember that it was suggested that the public interest be replaced by human rights and internet freedom.
>
> Tijani
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] De la part de Adam Peake
> Envoyé : lundi 16 février 2015 18:45
> À : Accountability Cross Community
> Objet : [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG list summary, Jan 30 to Feb 5
>
> Apologies for the delay sending this summary. It was sent to the advisors last week.
>
> Best,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <~WRD000.jpg>
> Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection Antivirus avast! est active.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
>
> Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection Antivirus avast! est active.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150217/b08982f7/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list