[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG list summary, Jan 30 to Feb 5

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Olivier
I also fully agree with your views
Kavouss

Sent from my iPhone

> On 19 Feb 2015, at 07:21, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 19/02/2015 04:36, Greg Shatan wrote:
>> If this group wants to devote itself to trying to define in detail
>> what the "public interest" is for ICANN, that will pull us way off
>> track.  Although the principle is basic, the nuances once you try to
>> parse it out will be anything but basic.  This can be a goal for ICANN
>> in the long run, and as Samantha Eisner indicated, this is an effort
>> that is underway.  Rather than pulling that task into this group, it
>> would make more sense for those interested in that effort to plug into
>> that effort, and to consider appropriate linkages between that effort
>> and this one.
> 
> Having been in many, many working groups that considered defining what
> the "public interest" is for ICANN, I have to agree that this is not the
> best use of the WG's time. We all know when a decision is in the public
> interest - ie. it serves the public good, but defining it only serves to
> reduce its scope and make it an incomplete term.
> It's like defining "wet" in "water is wet".
> Kind regards,
> 
> Olivier
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community