[CCWG-Accountability] Expected outcome of Frankfurt F2F meeting

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Paul
What do you see in US NOW
May you please forward that to us .At least I do not have access to that
information.
Kavouss

2015-01-01 23:19 GMT+01:00 Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na>:

> Dear co-chairs,
>
> (through the co-chairs)
>
> English is only my third language and I am not that familiar with reading
> between the lines of US new-speak, and hence need your assistance in
> determining wether my understanding of this being a threat if doesn't get
> his way is correct, and if so whether it is acceptable under the charter?
>
> greetings, el
>
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
>
> On Jan 1, 2015, at 22:38, Paul Rosenzweig <
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Mathieu
>
>
>
> You are, of course, the Co-Chair and you will have to figure out how to
> interact with the Board.  I hope, however, that you will not be reluctant
> to make the Board accountable.  I can see the headline here in the US now
> “ICANN Accountability Board Not Even Willing To Ask Questions.”
>   Frankly, I would write it myself …..
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> ***NOTE:  OUR NEW ADDRESS -- EFFECTIVE 12/15/14 ****
>
> 509 C St. NE
>
> Washington, DC 20002
>
>
>
> Paul Rosenzweig
>
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
> <paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
>
> O: +1 (202) 547-0660
>
> M: +1 (202) 329-9650
>
> Skype: +1 (202) 738-1739 or paul.rosenzweig1066
>
> Link to my PGP Key
> <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9>
>
>
>
> *From:* Mathieu Weill [mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 1, 2015 5:33 AM
> *To:* accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CCWG-Accountability] Expected outcome of Frankfurt F2F meeting
>
>
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> During our call #4 we had an exchange of views regarding the expected
> outcome of our upcoming F2F meeting in Frankfurt. We agreed that we would
> initiate a discussion on the list on the proposals that we shared before
> finalizing at our next meeting. Clarity about expected outcomes is
> necessary before we get deeper into the preparation of this important step
> in our work.
>
> The current expected outcomes we submit for your review and comments are
> the following :
>
> a. Finalize agreement on scope of the group & definition, such as the
> purpose of accountability (as discussed, a strawman proposal is being
> drafted and will be circulated shortly)
> b. Agree on WS1 vs WS2 classification criteria + priorities. This should
> enable to provide clarity about expected outcome of WS1.
>
> c. Conclude inventory work from work areas, and as such, the assessment of
> Icann's current situation with regards to accountability. (please note this
> should include a list of the main contingencies we would "stress test" our
> proposals against).
>
>
> We are aware this is rather ambitious but hopeful this can be achieved
> thanks to the quality of the prep work from work areas as well as good
> preparation in the timeframe leading to Frankfurt.
>
> Your comments and feedbacks are welcome.
>
> Best regards, and happy new year to all of you !
>
> --
>
> *****************************
>
> Mathieu WEILL
>
> For the Co-chairs
>
> mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
>
> Twitter : @mathieuweill
>
> *****************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150101/e587f552/attachment.html>