[CCWG-Accountability] WS1 vs WS2 recap and proposals

[Greg Shatan]

How about:

All other consensus items could be in WS2, provided there are mechanisms in
WS1 adequate *to* force implementation of WS2 items *in the event of*
resistance from ICANN management and Board.

Greg Shatan

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Bruce Tonkin <
Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
>
> >>  WS 1 is designated for accountability mechanisms that must be in place
> of rimly committed to before IANA transition occurs.
> All other consensus items could be in WS2, provided there are mechanisms
> in WS1 adequate for force implementation of WS2 items despite resistance
> from Icann management and Board.
>
> If possible I would like to see the last phrase read:  "in case of
> resistance from ICANN Management and Board".   The current wording seems to
> assume there is some sort of default resistance.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150106/eadadc3b/attachment.html>