[CCWG-Accountability] the term "community"

[Roelof Meijer]

>I think the Netmundial outcome, not the current initiative, may indeed be worth considering for the >recommendations it makes about accountability.


Indeed


Cheers,

Roelof Meijer

SIDN | Meander 501 | 6825 MD | P.O. Box 5022 | 6802 EA | ARNHEM | THE NETHERLANDS
T +31 (0)26 352 55 00 | M +31 (0)6 11 395 775 | F +31 (0)26 352 55 05
roelof.meijer at sidn.nl<mailto:roelof.meijer at sidn.nl> | www.sidn.nl<http://www.sidn.nl/>
From: Avri Doria <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>>
Date: maandag 12 januari 2015 15:15
To: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>" <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-Accountability] the term "community"


On 11-Jan-15 11:58, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:

Dear Mr Arasteh.

I have also not referred to the outcome of NetMundial.  So I am
quite pleased that we have reached consensus to formally object to
its existence and any related output.

Not sure where this 'consensus' comes from.  I think the Netmundial outcome, not the current initiative, may indeed be worth considering for the recommendations it makes about accountability.


avri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150112/004d65c7/attachment.html>