[CCWG-ACCT] proposal for how community could be delegated to make some decisions

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Robin,
Thank you very much for your suggestion.
It deserved to be carefully examined among one of the possible options
while we need to also look at other options.
Coming back to your suggestion which already supported by some colleagues,
I have few legal and administrative queries which I come back to you once
the analysis are over.
However, there is a very important element which pushing hard on our head
and that is time constrains
We need to address that.
It seems that some colleagues are in hurry to have something.
I also wish to have something but something which is carefully analysed,
and supported by everybody and fully responds to the requirement .
Regards
Kavouss

2015-01-27 14:28 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

> D
>
> 2015-01-27 10:32 GMT+01:00 Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.na>:
>
>> I fail to see comments on the "line item" issue of stakeholders.
>>
>> Neither the GNSO, GAC, ALAC etc will have powers over ccNSO (policy)
>> and/or individual ccTLDs. Nor something as vague as a "Community".
>>
>>
>> Unless this is addressed I doubt this would fly.
>>
>> Or rather I know it will not.
>>
>> And, I would most certainly use one of my membership objections.
>>
>> Not negotiable.
>>
>> el
>>
>> On 2015-01-27 10:54, Fiona Asonga wrote:
>> > Robin,
>> >
>> > Your proposal make so much sense and will give the community an
>> > appropriate level of engagement and oversight without creating
>> > additional structures.
>> >
>> > Fiona Asonga
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > *From: *"Robin Gross" <robin at ipjustice.org>
>> > *To: *"David Post" <david.g.post at gmail.com>,
>> > "accountability-cross-community at icann.org Community"
>> > <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>> > *Sent: *Thursday, January 22, 2015 3:48:03 AM
>> > *Subject: *Re: [CCWG-ACCT] proposal for how community could be delegated
>> > to        make some decisions
>> >
>> > To flesh this proposal out a bit further: The "Community" could
>> > overturn a board decision on a limited number of key issues via an
>> > ombudsman mediated process in which a decision could be rendered
>> > via the "Community".  Each individual component of the Community
>> > (for example, GAC, GNSO, AT-Large, CCNSO, etc.)  would have a
>> > proportional weight in the over-all decision of the Community.
>> > Currently, each of these individual components already has
>> > internal mechanisms in place to make decisions (take policy
>> > positions, elections, etc.)  through which the decision of the
>> > Community is actually rendered.  This way, we don't need to create
>> > a new super-structure to be "Representational".  We can do away
>> > with that additional layer entirely - creating the "super board"
>> > because decisions can be made in the individual component's
>> > internal mechanisms.  This would be a much more bottom-up method
>> > of reaching a "Decision of the Community" regarding a particular
>> > board decision.  The ombudsman could act as the facilitator of
>> > this process: put the issue to vote, collect and tally the votes
>> > of the individual components to render the "Decision of the
>> > Community".  The board would then be required to adopt this
>> > Decision of the Community unless it voted (unanimous or
>> > super-majority) to not adopt the Decision of the Community, which
>> > could be stipulated to in bylaws.  The board would retain ultimate
>> > decisional authority as required by Cal Corp law, but it would be
>> > very difficult for it to ignore the bottom-up Decision of the
>> > Community.  Coupled with a mechanism to recall recalcitrant board
>> > members, this overall model could solve many of our problems and
>> > remake ICANN in a more bottom-up fashion without too much
>> > structural redesign.  Thoughts?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Robin
>> [...]
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
>> el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
>> PO Box 8421             \     /
>> Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150127/f39ff019/attachment.html>