[CCWG-ACCT] Redactions in ICANN documents

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Until such time as ewe have community standards on redactions, I think
including the contractual or other provision they are relying on for the
redaction, as Samantha did in her note, is a useful measure.

avri

On 17-Jul-15 09:56, Chris Disspain wrote:
> I don’t believe much ‘convincing’ would be necessary el.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>> On 17 Jul 2015, at 17:52 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.NA
>> <mailto:el at lisse.NA>> wrote:
>>
>> I am wondering if we can perhaps convince ICANN to in the interim
>> when they redact documents, to write something like "Redacted on
>> request of ........"  so that if we were to take ICANN staff by
>> their word that they only redact because of transparency (!)  we
>> know at least which side they are on :-)-O
>>
>> greetings, el
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus