[CCWG-ACCT] Staff accountability

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

.Africa is not the issue.

How Staff and the Board (and the GAC) behave(d) is the issue.

And to make sure it doesn't happen again.  Not so much what to do
after it happens again.

But any review mechanism, committee or otherwise needs muscle, ie
directly enforced powers.  Waffling in yet another Wg will not do
anything other than generating a few plane tickets, hotel bills and
per diems.

el


On 2015-07-17 06:17 , Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I don't think getting a set of people from the community involved
> would ultimately mean transparency in practice.
> 
> I think reviewing the IRP processes in a manner that ensures it's
> activities are publicly logged(to the extent that they are
> legitimate) and available for follow-up by any member of the
> community may help.
> 
> Each SO/AC could then decide to constitute their own committees
> that will follow such subject matter.  Like within ALAC we
> currently have the iana-issue WG that's follows the IANA
> transition activities.
> 
> Unfortunately, up until now .Africa issues (all the delays) was
> not seen as a global interest.  The community orientations may
> also need to change if we really like to see transparency in
> action.
> 
> Regards
[...]

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4198 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150717/f7297185/smime.p7s>