[CCWG-ACCT] RES: CCWG - Analysis of GAC Comments

Dr Eberhard W Lisse el at lisse.na
Mon Jul 20 07:49:24 UTC 2015


Mathieu,

with all due respect, we do have very competent staff and we should be able to group tye contributions and then produce a "sliding scale" from least to maximal (whichever criteria) where we graph this?

el
-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

> On Jul 20, 2015, at 08:29, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> After consulting with several govts regarding our draft analysis of the GAC comments to the CCWG it was agreed that it would be difficult for us to produce an analysis which would properly represent all the views presented in the the document.
> 
> Given the GAC comments is not a long document it should be allowed to stand on its own to represent the views of the govts which have provided responses.
> 
> The original document from the GAC is attached for your convenience.
> 
> Mathieu Weill
> CCWG co-Chair
> 
> 
> Le 17/07/2015 14:41, Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva a écrit :
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I agree with the comments made by Olga. 
>> 
>> The positions expressed by Brazil, Argentina and other countries have not been properly captured in this presentation and therefore it does not reflect the whole spectrum of views present in the GAC input document.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Pedro    
>> De: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] em nome de Olga Cavalli [olgacavalli at gmail.com]
>> Enviado: sexta-feira, 17 de julho de 2015 8:30
>> Para: Bernard Turcotte
>> Cc: Accountability Cross Community
>> Assunto: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Analysis of GAC Comments
>> 
>> Dear Bernard,
>> 
>> Thanks for the summary.
>> 
>> I would like to make some comments and additions to your document:
>> 
>> - Question 2:
>> There is no reference in the summary about the request from governements that want to have a full balanced participation among all the stakeholders, with equal footing among them.
>> 
>> - Question 3:
>> There is no reference about the % of governments that want to be fully involved in the CEM (not ONLY  trough liaisons).
>> Argentina is one of them and there are others.
>> 
>> - Question 4:
>> There is no reference to % of governments that want to have a different role as only advisory.
>> Argentina is one of them and there are others.
>> 
>> - Question 5: 
>> There is no reference to the % of governments that WANT to excercise community powers.
>> Argentina is one of them and there are others.
>> 
>> As representative of the Government of Argentina, I kindly ask you to include these other views into the summary.
>> 
>> Best regards 
>> 
>> Olga Cavalli
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2015-07-17 6:46 GMT-03:00 Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>:
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> Per the co-chairs request please find attached the analysis of the GAC comments to the CCWG.
>>> 
>>> Cheers.
>>> 
>>> B.
>>> 
>>> PS I will circulate the open format version later.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> -- 
> *****************************
> Mathieu WEILL
> AFNIC - directeur général
> Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
> mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> Twitter : @mathieuweill
> *****************************
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150720/950b98d0/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list