[CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] New section - ICANN Community Assembly
Edward Morris
egmorris1 at toast.net
Mon Jul 27 17:31:30 UTC 2015
Hi Alan,
I completely disagree.
The ICA is an integral part of the model we've proposed to exercise
community powers.
----------------------------------------
- We will not likely need this powers in the coming months, and if we do,
some sort of community discussion will happen regardless of us architecting
it or not.
If community discussion was all the ICA was designed to foster you might
be correct. It's much more than that though. The ICA is community plus. The
community will be there but so won't, should he or she chose, the ICANN CEO
as well as Board members, staff...it's a fantastic idea and I'm hopeful
would negate the need for votes or the exercise of community powers.
Bringing people together to foster dialogue about contentious issues
should, in most cases, allow reasonable people to broker differences and
avoid the need to escalate conflict.
I'm also a little bit leary of going the "some sort of community
discussion" group route. Ad hoc discussions tend to result in less
diversity, less inclusiveness and perpetuate a status quo that may or may
not be legitimate.
I'm a big supporter of the ICA, excited about it's potential, and
certainly can see no reason to defer it to WS2.
Best,
Ed
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150727/95885fdc/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list