[CCWG-ACCT] Draft Agenda & Papers - WP1 Meeting #22 (28 July at 19h UTC)
Dr Eberhard Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Tue Jul 28 13:14:14 UTC 2015
Quite of of context from the bylaws:
"However, the ccNSO may also engage in other activities authorized by
its members."
:-)-O
On 2015-07-28 13:45, Chris Disspain wrote:
> Hi Avri,
>
>> SOs are only
>> empowered to make recommendations on the subject matter of the SO, i.e.
>> only on gTLDs, ccTLDs or Numbers.
>
> Agree.
>
>> We assrt our right to comment on
>> other stuff, but there is no bylaws indication of this empowerment.
>
> Who is we?
>
>> It is only the ACs that are empowered to advise on any issue having to
>> do with ICANN.
>
> Agreed. So that means that the non-contracting party bits of GNSO are
> only empowered to comment on gTLD matters, doesn’t it?
>
> Assuming that is correct then it seems to me that in respect to 'ICANN’s
> general well being’ we should not draw a distinction between ACs and
> SOs. SOs and ACs are empowered to comment on 'ICANN’s general well
> being’ with authority/weight and bits of the SOs and ACs are entitled to
> comment (as is anyone as an individual) but not with the same authority
> and weight as comments on SOs and ACs as a whole.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Chris
[...]
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ /
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list