[CCWG-ACCT] so what is the current outcome on human rights.

Drazek, Keith kdrazek at verisign.com
Thu Jul 30 22:51:37 UTC 2015


+1

Keith


On Jul 30, 2015, at 6:45 PM, Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au<mailto:ceo at auda.org.au>> wrote:

All,

Irrespective of whether this ends up in WS 1 or 2 we really do need to do the work to define what we mean by the words we use. What are fundamental human rights? Whose definition are we using? And it would be really useful to have some examples of something concrete ICANN would have to do if it made this commitment or something it would not be able to do.

If we are not prepared or equipped to do that work now then this MUST go to WS 2 IMO. If we are prepared to do the work now I’m happy to help.



Cheers,


Chris

On 31 Jul 2015, at 08:37 , Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at actonline.org<mailto:JZuck at actonline.org>> wrote:

Good question! The waters got muddy at the end. I appears as though there was a simple majority in favor of something being in there and, given that, a simple majority in favor of Greg's language. I don't know what that means for the draft that will go out to the public. There was talk of another poll on the listserv to capture more folks.

80% sure you don't need to draft anything and Greg will need to draft an inline objection on behalf of part of the CSG....but who knows?

Jonathan Zuck
President
202-331-2130 X 101 | jzuck at actonline.org<mailto:jzuck at actonline.org> | Skype: jvzuck

ACT | The App Association








________________________________________
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Avri Doria <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>>
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 5:27 PM
To: Accountability Cross Community
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] so what is the current outcome on human rights.

Dear esteemed chairs,

Perhaps it was because I was following only the chat, but I cannot tell
where the issue was left.  I am sorry I could not stay on the call, but
I had a classroom of students I was guiding through a multistakeholder
practicum. i.e I was working, for pay even.

Does the reference recommendation currently include a bylaw on Human Rights?
If so, which one?

I am trying to decide on whether I need to spend tonight finishing my
minority report or not.

Also Is the deadline for the minority reports that want to be include in
the report still Friday at 1800 utc?

Thanks

avri


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150730/c53e22b6/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list