[CCWG-ACCT] so what is the current outcome on human rights.

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Fri Jul 31 06:04:02 UTC 2015


Hi,

Not only would we lose leverage, but until such time as WS2 completed
its work there would be no protection of human rights and especially no
protection for freedom of expression and the free flow of knowledge.

avri

On 31-Jul-15 07:31, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> No,
>  
> we don't.
>
> In terms of the Charter need to determine whether we have Full
> Consensus, Consensus or enough objections to constitut No Consensus of
> the members appointed by the chartering AC/SOs. 
>
> The participants do not take part in this determination and/or any
> related polls.
>
> Qualifying language has the restrictive effect of excluding what is
> not mentioned. Hence I will only accept an unqualified requirement. 
>
> This can go into WS2 but we then loose leverage.
>
> el
>
>   
> -- 
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6
>
>
> On Jul 30, 2015, at 23:59, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
> <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Dear All
>> Grec ,s proposal got 11 in favour and 8 against( those voted for
>> Keith, s proposal)
>> Keith,s proposal got 8 in favour and 11 against( those voted for
>> Grec, s proposal)
>> My proposal got 8 in favour and 4 against
>> We thus need to identify the proposal that gained a more clear majority
>> Kavouss    
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 31 Jul 2015, at 07:37, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at actonline.org
>>> <mailto:JZuck at actonline.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Good question! The waters got muddy at the end. I appears as though
>>> there was a simple majority in favor of something being in there
>>> and, given that, a simple majority in favor of Greg's language. I
>>> don't know what that means for the draft that will go out to the
>>> public. There was talk of another poll on the listserv to capture
>>> more folks.
>>>
>>> 80% sure you don't need to draft anything and Greg will need to
>>> draft an inline objection on behalf of part of the CSG....but who knows?
>>>
>>> Jonathan Zuck
>
> [...]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus




More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list