[CCWG-ACCT] XPLANE - comments please

[Roelof Meijer]

Hi Adam,

Great work, the general concept and most of the content is really good. If
we add it to our report, I expect it will really help readers to grasp the
essence of what we are proposing quickly.

Some remarks:

I take it that the graphics will be expanded to cover all the essential
changes we propose (bylaws, reconsideration process)

The slide ³Approve changes to fundamental bylaws² still needs editing. How
it works it NOT that AC/SO object to the change. ICANN proposes a change
and the ³empowered community² approves or not

The slide ³Recalling individual board members also needs editing. The ³who
can initiate a petition² is only proposed for recall of NomCom appointees.
The way it is placed now, suggests it would also apply for SO and AC
appointees

Best,

Roelof




On 01-05-15 06:23, "Adam Peake" <adam.peake at icann.org> wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>XPLANE are working to improve the graphics you saw on the call and would
>appreciate any feedback.
>
>Any corrections, comments or ideas on how best to display the board
>removal/recall?  
>
>The IRP has been mentioned as the "crown jewels" of the CCWG's work - are
>the graphics a good representation of what the group is proposing?
>
>Thank you,
>
>Adam
>
>
>