[CCWG-ACCT] Edits due in 3h: V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May at 01:00 UTC

Sat May 2 23:46:55 UTC 2015

Fully agree with you Avri. This is exactly my position, and thank you very
much for expressing it very clearly and in the best way.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Tijani BEN JEMAA

Executive Director

Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)

Phone:  + 216 41 649 605

Mobile: + 216 98 330 114

Fax:       + 216 70 853 376

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

De : accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] De la part de Avri
Doria
Envoyé : samedi 2 mai 2015 16:28
À : accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Edits due in 3h: V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May
at 01:00 UTC

Hi,

I too agree that the report should take a multistakeholder view that treats
all ICANN stakeholders equally.

I do not think that it is necessary that that all stakeholders decide to do
things in the same manner, but that the various options should be open to
all stakeholders on an overall equal footing. I do not believe that all
stakeholders have the same roles and responsibilities in each phase of every
operation.  But in the overall process there needs to be a balanced and
equal footing.  This is a goal in my view in all Internet Governance (IG)
mechanisms.  ICANN is an organization that is closer to doing this in a open
and  equal footing manner than most organizations in IG.  I think that it is
is important in this Accountabilty work to be clear about that continuing
goal.

I do not, however, wish to accidentally fall into the pattern where there is
parity between 2 stakeholder grouping: private and public. Rather we need
the full multistakeholder mix.  I think we should mention neither public nor
private and just mention the diversity of stakeholder groups involved in
ICANN.  The word multistakeholder should be sufficient.

avri

On 02-May-15 10:06, Olga Cavalli wrote:

Dear all, 

thanks for the draft.

I support Kavouss comments and suggested edits.

Regards

Olga

2015-05-02 4:35 GMT-03:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

IMPORTANT AND URGENT 

Dear co-chairs,

Thank you very much for your enormous and tireless efforts to put this doc.
for final comments

I have had many comments but I could not finish the edits till now.

I therefore do not wish to delay the work.

However, I have one VERY IMPORTANT edit that I raised it in my last e-mail.

That edit is relating to a reference to ICANN or Internet Process as being
«private led  multistakeholder”  organization or process.

This is a mistake. a big mistake. There is no such preference to one
category of stakeholder over other categories of stakeholder (private or
public) .

I raised this matter at one of our call and asked for deletion of that term.

All stakeholder, irrespective being private, public, and etc. SHALL  be
treated equally. This issue was raised at various occasions by NTIA
indicating / emphasizing that no single category of the stakeholder should
benefit from preference over other categories of stakeholders .This term was
used at very early stage of the introduction of the ICANN into the business.
Over the time when we discussed that the process should be inclusive,
democratic, then it was agreed by everybody that no category of the
stakeholder should have any preference, what so ever, or should have   a
preferred treatment over other categories of the stakeholders.

In view of the above, I urge you to  kindly correct such a big mistake which
if it is not corrected would put us in a very delicate situation that we did
not respect impartiality and neutrality in treating  various categories of
the stakeholders.

There are 4 or 5 times that such a reference to »private led
multistakeholder  are referred to in the doc.

Pls kindly make a simple «find" check and delete all that.  Term in other
part of doc. whenever, so as reference is maded to multistakeholder there is
no such an incorrect and discriminative preference.

Regards

Kavouss 

2015-05-02 9:01 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

Dear All,

I have not finish edits .I am on page 50. However, in view of time time
constrain, I have an important edit that is attached.

The same edit should be carried forward elsewhere  throughout the entire
document . please then search for " private sector led " and DELETE THAT . I
mentioned in one of the call .See Attached doc. 

Regards

2015-05-02 3:34 GMT+02:00 Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>:

Thanks Grace.  

Dear CCWG, 

Attached please find some proposed edits for consideration.

Best, 

Sam

From: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 3:52 PM
To: Accountability Cross Community
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Edits due in 3h: V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May at
01:00 UTC

Hi all, 

Just a reminder than edits, comments are due in approximately 3h. Thank you
to those who sent edits earlier today.  If you must send late edits, please
send a note to the Chairs with staff in copy to give us notice that your
comments will be delayed. Best to stick to the deadline, but we know
everyone is working hard to get this draft report ready, and we’d rather get
your comments than not at all.

Have a good weekend, 

Grace

From: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM
To: Accountability Cross Community
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May at 01:00 UTC

Dear all, 

We sent the V10 draft report earlier today (in UTC) but have been notified
that, in some cases, the files are too large to download from the email
attachments. As a reminder, the draft (redline and clean versions) are
posted on the Wiki:
https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Draft+Report. 

Looking forward to receiving your comments and edits,

Grace

From: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
Date: Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:22 PM
To: Accountability Cross Community
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May at 01:00 UTC

Dear all, 

Here attached is the CCWG-Accountability Draft Report V10. I have attached a
redline and a clean version (in Word and PDF). 

Version 10 incorporates the following: 

*	Changes from the CCWG-Accountability call on Thursday 30 April at
05:00 UTC
*	Edits from legal counsel (Sidley and Adler)
*	Approval from the CWG-Stewardship Chairs/Client Committee regarding
incorporation of CWG-Stewardship recommendations
*	Edits from Chairs and Rapporteurs 

Please send your edits, comments, etc to the mailing list bySaturday 2 May
01:00 UTC (24h from now). Staff will incorporate the edits over the weekend
so as to release a final version for Public Comment on Monday, 4 May. If
possible, edits are appreciate in track changes in the clean version so that
they are clearly marked and visible. There will be professional formatting
and copyediting done before publication, so we suggest that your time my be
best spent by focusing on the substance-related edits. 

Also, please remember to submit your feedback regarding the XPlane graphics
by Saturday as well. Adam will send a reminder re: XPlane. 

Almost there!

— Grace 

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

  _____  

 <http://www.avast.com/> Image supprimée par l'expéditeur. Avast logo

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>  

---
Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150503/f7872143/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ~WRD000.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150503/f7872143/WRD000.jpg>