[CCWG-ACCT] V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May at 01:00 UTC

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear James.
Thank you for reaction.
This comment was supported by at least 4 other members.
I have explained clearly that we should make every effort not to take any
polarization or division motivation.
 Button Up Multistakeholder approach is a process which followed and led by
the entire multistakeholder and should not have any inappropriate refernce
to Private or public led motivation.
Pls read my full explanation.as communicated to all in my previous mails
supported by others.-
Let us be united, inclussive, democtrative, neutral and impartial without
giving any additional rights to any group .
NTIA AT VARIOUS OCCASIONS MENTIONED THAT THE TRANSITION PROCESS TOGETHER
WITH ITS ASSOCIATED ACCOUNTABILTY SHOULD NOT ADDRESS THE INTERESTS OF A
PARTICULAR GROUP
REGARDS
kavouss

2015-05-03 14:22 GMT+02:00 James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>:

> I do think that we should have some clarity on the status of Kavouss's
> comments.
>
> -James
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kavouss
> Arasteh
> Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2015 1:10 PM
> To: Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr
> Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May at 01:00 UTC
>
> Dear Mathieu,
> You have replied to every body except me, olga, paar, and those others who
> have supported me for the deletion of the adjective/term   " private led"
> before multistakeholders throughout the entire document
> This is the fifth reminder
> Kavouss .
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 3 May 2015, at 13:45, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Izumi, all,
> >
> > Thank you for raising this point, indeed this is quite important.
> Hopefully we can engage with the numbering community, through our ASO
> appointed members, in order to investigate such implications.
> >
> > Best
> > Mathieu
> >
> > Le 01/05/2015 07:01, Izumi Okutani a écrit :
> >> Dear Grace and all,
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for the latest draft and reminder for the comments.
> >>
> >> I would like to suggest to add notes below for "2.4 INDEPENDENT REVIEW
> PANEL ENHANCEMENT" and "2.5 RECONSIDERATION PROCESS ENHANCEMENT sections".
> >>
> >> "In case of including the global number resources policy in its scope,
> further considerations should be made of its implications. The bottom up
> policy development process and its forum for the number resources is
> outside the ICANN, even though the ICANN Board approves its global
> policies, and the same mechanisms as the names related policies may not be
> applicable."
> >>
> >> I had raised it earlier in my post "The scope of "policy"" and
> according to my memory it was agreed in one of the CCWG meetings to
> incorporate it.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Izumi
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 2015/05/01 10:23, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
> >>> Dear all,
> >>>
> >>> Here attached is the CCWG-Accountability Draft Report V10. I have
> attached a
> >>> redline and a clean version (in Word and PDF).
> >>>
> >>> Version 10 incorporates the following:
> >>> * Changes from the CCWG-Accountability call on Thursday 30 April at
> 05:00
> >>> UTC
> >>> * Edits from legal counsel (Sidley and Adler)
> >>> * Approval from the CWG-Stewardship Chairs/Client Committee regarding
> >>> incorporation of CWG-Stewardship recommendations
> >>> * Edits from Chairs and Rapporteurs
> >>> Please send your edits, comments, etc to the mailing list by Saturday
> 2 May
> >>> 01:00 UTC (24h from now). Staff will incorporate the edits over the
> weekend
> >>> so as to release a final version for Public Comment on Monday, 4 May.
> If
> >>> possible, edits are appreciate in track changes in the clean version
> so that
> >>> they are clearly marked and visible. There will be professional
> formatting
> >>> and copyediting done before publication, so we suggest that your time
> my be
> >>> best spent by focusing on the substance-related edits.
> >>>
> >>> Also, please remember to submit your feedback regarding the XPlane
> graphics
> >>> by Saturday as well. Adam will send a reminder re: XPlane.
> >>>
> >>> Almost there!
> >>> � Grace
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> >>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> >> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> >
> > --
> > *****************************
> > Mathieu WEILL
> > AFNIC - directeur général
> > Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
> > mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> > Twitter : @mathieuweill
> > *****************************
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150503/75ee033e/attachment.html>