[CCWG-ACCT] about the CCWG 30-day comment period

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

So,

now ICANN staff decides what comment period is acceptable.

Outrageously unacceptable and objected to.

I am still waiting for the response to my request to be provided with the notes or emails where this was discussed and approved by the CCWG. 

rl

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

> On May 5, 2015, at 21:41, Adam Peake <adam.peake at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Note on behalf of Thomas, Leon and Mathieu about the CCWG proposal 30-day
> public comment period.
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> We have seen comments about the 30-day public comment period.  You will
> remember this has been our intention since we discussed planning in
> Istanbul, and we concluded this discussion on the CCWG call of 30 April.
> The outcome was to propose the first public comment should be for 30 days,
> which would allow time for us to prepare a response for the ICANN meeting
> in  Buenos Aires.  It is particularly important that we are able to
> respond to the dependencies identified by the CWG-Stewardship.
> 
> Recognizing that the shorter public comment is not ideal for a subject of
> such importance to the community, we also took into account the fact that
> we will to hold a second public comment period some weeks after ICANN53
> when we will seek input on any outstanding issues and provide details and
> explanation prompted by discussions with the community from the first
> public comment and during ICANN53.
> 
> The public comment announcement includes the remark "Because this (first)
> Public Comment period is less than the required 40-day minimum, it has
> been approved by two ICANN Global Leaders."  The term Global Leaders is a
> reference to senior members of the ICANN staff and the condition was
> created to ensure that a check existed so that a single ICANN department
> would not depart from the standard default time period without broader
> senior staff input.  The public comment guidelines and procedures are
> available on the public wiki
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=48344695
> 
> Warm regards,
> 
> Thomas, Leon and Mathieu
> CCWG co-chairs
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community