[CCWG-ACCT] about the CCWG 30-day comment period

[Greg Shatan]

The public comment forum typically stays open for a while afterwards, as
far as I can tell (indeed, I'm not sure when they are closed, thought they
may not get checked after a while.


Greg

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Bruce Tonkin <
Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:

> I think it would be worth holding the public comment forum itself open up
> to and including Buenos Aires - but just note that the deadline applies
> with respect to responding to any of the comments in time for the Buenos
> Aires meeting.
>
> I would expect for  example that we are unlikely to get GAC feedback until
> after their meeting in Buenos Aires.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Adam Peake
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 May 2015 6:41 AM
> To: Accountability Cross Community
> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] about the CCWG 30-day comment period
>
> Note on behalf of Thomas, Leon and Mathieu about the CCWG proposal 30-day
> public comment period.
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We have seen comments about the 30-day public comment period.  You will
> remember this has been our intention since we discussed planning in
> Istanbul, and we concluded this discussion on the CCWG call of 30 April.
> The outcome was to propose the first public comment should be for 30 days,
> which would allow time for us to prepare a response for the ICANN meeting
> in  Buenos Aires.  It is particularly important that we are able to respond
> to the dependencies identified by the CWG-Stewardship.
>
> Recognizing that the shorter public comment is not ideal for a subject of
> such importance to the community, we also took into account the fact that
> we will to hold a second public comment period some weeks after ICANN53
> when we will seek input on any outstanding issues and provide details and
> explanation prompted by discussions with the community from the first
> public comment and during ICANN53.
>
> The public comment announcement includes the remark "Because this (first)
> Public Comment period is less than the required 40-day minimum, it has been
> approved by two ICANN Global Leaders."  The term Global Leaders is a
> reference to senior members of the ICANN staff and the condition was
> created to ensure that a check existed so that a single ICANN department
> would not depart from the standard default time period without broader
> senior staff input.  The public comment guidelines and procedures are
> available on the public wiki
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=48344695
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Thomas, Leon and Mathieu
> CCWG co-chairs
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150505/18fe301e/attachment.html>