[CCWG-ACCT] [ccTLDcommunity] [ccnso-members] about the CCWG 30-day comment period

[Burr, Becky]

Supreme Leader of the Global Internet

J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  /
becky.burr at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz






On 5/6/15, 9:18 AM, "Roelof Meijer" <Roelof.Meijer at sidn.nl> wrote:

>I am wondering: when Adam writes ³we² our group seems to think he means
>³ICANN staff².
>I do not think ICANN staff has set our time table. I read Adam¹s "You will
>remember this has been our intention since we discussed planning in
>Istanbul, and we concluded this discussion on the CCWG call of 30 April.²
>as us, the CCWG, deciding on it.
>
>Completely off-topic, but so ridiculous that I cannot help myself: if
>ICANN senior staff are now described as ³ICANN GlobalLeaders², what would
>that make its CEO? ICANN Leader of the Universe? OMG...
>
>Cheers,
>
>Roelof
>
>
>
>
>On 06-05-15 00:04, "J. William Semich" <bill at nunames.nu> wrote:
>
>>
>>I agree with Dr. Lisse 100%.
>>
>>ICANN staff must not set the timetables for any consensus process. Nor
>>should any committee (co-)chairs.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Bill Semich
>>.NU Domain
>>
>>On May 5, 2015, at 5:11 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.NA> wrote:
>>
>>> 
>>> So,
>>> 
>>> now ICANN staff decides what comment period is acceptable.
>>> 
>>> Outrageously unacceptable and objected to.
>>> 
>>> I am still waiting for the response to my request to be provided with
>>>the notes or emails where this was discussed and approved by the CCWG.
>>> 
>>> el
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
>>> 
>>>> On May 5, 2015, at 21:41, Adam Peake <adam.peake at icann.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Note on behalf of Thomas, Leon and Mathieu about the CCWG proposal
>>>>30-day
>>>> public comment period.
>>>> 
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> 
>>>> We have seen comments about the 30-day public comment period.  You
>>>>will
>>>> remember this has been our intention since we discussed planning in
>>>> Istanbul, and we concluded this discussion on the CCWG call of 30
>>>>April.
>>>> The outcome was to propose the first public comment should be for 30
>>>>days,
>>>> which would allow time for us to prepare a response for the ICANN
>>>>meeting
>>>> in  Buenos Aires.  It is particularly important that we are able to
>>>> respond to the dependencies identified by the CWG-Stewardship.
>>>> 
>>>> Recognizing that the shorter public comment is not ideal for a subject
>>>>of
>>>> such importance to the community, we also took into account the fact
>>>>that
>>>> we will to hold a second public comment period some weeks after
>>>>ICANN53
>>>> when we will seek input on any outstanding issues and provide details
>>>>and
>>>> explanation prompted by discussions with the community from the first
>>>> public comment and during ICANN53.
>>>> 
>>>> The public comment announcement includes the remark "Because this
>>>>(first)
>>>> Public Comment period is less than the required 40-day minimum, it has
>>>> been approved by two ICANN Global Leaders."  The term Global Leaders
>>>>is a
>>>> reference to senior members of the ICANN staff and the condition was
>>>> created to ensure that a check existed so that a single ICANN
>>>>department
>>>> would not depart from the standard default time period without broader
>>>> senior staff input.  The public comment guidelines and procedures are
>>>> available on the public wiki
>>>> 
>>>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.or
>>>>g_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D48344695&d=AwIFAw&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC
>>>>_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=7sGp24jbBukIHCrY
>>>>F0V6pKMBTNXU_XGOWPKLenlDbO4&s=TDGni9zmPd1WsDjydwXHkeq4r_Pr36HgW19mv4hdy
>>>>xU&e= 
>>>> 
>>>> Warm regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Thomas, Leon and Mathieu
>>>> CCWG co-chairs
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>> 
>>>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailm
>>>>an_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=AwIFAw&c=MOptNlVtIETeD
>>>>ALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=7sGp24jbBukIH
>>>>CrYF0V6pKMBTNXU_XGOWPKLenlDbO4&s=pYEe5GZ4g_Gdd9VruLF943nN1wHlpOiZECHShp
>>>>B-GEA&e= 
>>> 
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ccTLDcommunity mailing list
>ccTLDcommunity at cctld-managers.org
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lists.cctld-2Dmana
>gers.org_mailman_listinfo_cctldcommunity&d=AwIFAw&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw
>&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=7sGp24jbBukIHCrYF0V6pKMBT
>NXU_XGOWPKLenlDbO4&s=aOT0boeZTOxBZAJOBrEfJm29YvrcHyhLFNL4aNSNtpA&e=
>
>To unsubscribe please send a blank email to
>ccTLDcommunity-unsubscribe at lists.cctld-managers.org