[CCWG-ACCT] Definition of Hell for each Myers Briggs Personality Type

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

s/upu/but you/

el

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 5s


> On May 15, 2015, at 17:27, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <epilisse at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Co-Chairs,
> 
> not that it is any of his business upu may inform our colleague, that I am fully aware of the Charter.
> 
> All of it.
> 
> And I will, as he, do whatever I want.
> 
> el
> 
> -- 
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 5s
> 
> 
>> On May 15, 2015, at 16:01, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>>  
>> I request that you remind our colleague that the CCWG Charter includes an established process for escalating procedural complaints:
>>  
>>  
>> Section V:  Rules of Engagement
>> Decision-Making Methodologies:
>> Any member who disagrees with the consensus-level designation made by the Chair(s), or believes that his/her contributions are being systematically ignored or discounted should first discuss the circumstances with the relevant sub-group chair or the CCWG-Accountability co-chairs. In the event that the matter cannot be resolved satisfactorily, the group member should request an opportunity to discuss the situation with the Chairs of the chartering organizations or their designated representatives.
>>  
>> I recommend our colleague exercise the established mechanism in the CCWG Charter and request a discussion with the Chairs of the Chartering Organizations, rather than continuing to pepper the CCWG email list with unhelpful and disrespectful messages. If our colleague chooses to not avail himself of this established escalation mechanism, any future claims of procedural deficiencies should be considered accordingly.
>>  
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Keith
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Dr Eberhard W Lisse
>> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 9:31 AM
>> To: CCWG Accountability
>> Cc: directors at omadhina.net
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Definition of Hell for each Myers Briggs Personality Type
>>  
>> Since this is the dump of unproductiveness apparently, it fits right in.
>>  
>> el
>> 
>> -- 
>> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
>> 
>> On May 15, 2015, at 13:31, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at actonline.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I saw this today and just couldn’t help sharing it with the group. I submit the following definitions of Hell without further comment…
>>  
>> ESTJ – An incredibly impractical person is put in charge of all of your major life decisions. You have to do whatever they say and are powerless to argue or reason with them.
>> INFP – Your deepest thoughts and feelings are exposed to a large audience and everyone thinks that you’re pathetic and unoriginal.
>> INTJ – Every time you open your mouth to say something intelligent, something entirely idiotic comes out instead.
>> ESFJ – Someone you love is in dire need of practical help and you can’t give it to them. Worse yet, they think you’re refusing to help them out of pettiness and they’re mad at you.
>> ESFP – You are stuck in a room by yourself for the rest of eternity.
>> ISTP – The Zombie apocalypse happens but you’re suddenly the world’s weakest fighter and must depend solely on your loved ones to keep you alive.
>> ENFP – Every minute of the rest of your life has been scheduled for you – and it’s a long series of arbitrary, solitary tasks.
>> ISFP – You have to listen to rude people criticizing your personal choices, your appearance and your art form all day long. Nobody cares that they’re hurting your feelings.
>> ENFJ – Your loved ones are in dire need of guidance but every piece of advice you gives them inadvertently makes things worse for them.
>> ISFJ – Everyone you love is yelling at each other and it’s all your fault.
>> ISTJ – You are expected to complete a highly esteemed project with absolutely no guidance as to what’s expected of you.
>> INFJ – You are eternally damned to working for a morally corrupt company that aims to exploit the weak and generally degrade conditions for all of society.
>> ESTP – You are completely paralyzed, lacking even the ability to speak.
>> ENTP – Freedom of speech is revoked from the constitution. Voicing your opinion in any way is now illegal.
>> INTP – You are eternally condemned to researching an extremely vapid topic using wildly inaccurate methods, mostly involving interviewing people who have no idea what they’re talking about.
>> ENTJ – Somebody is wrong, and they’re directing a large group of people! You can’t do anything about it and will have to obey whatever inefficient policies they decide to implement. 
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150515/1e372bd9/attachment.html>