[CCWG-ACCT] Transparency recap (Was: Contribution on Transparency Reforms for CCWG)

[Burr, Becky]

Review and enhancement of DIDP has been a WS2 item for months.


J. Beckwith Burr
Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer


From: <Schaefer>, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org<mailto:Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>>
Date: Monday, November 2, 2015 at 1:06 PM
To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>>, Keith Drazek <kdrazek at verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>>
Cc: Accountability Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Transparency recap (Was: Contribution on Transparency Reforms for CCWG)

That said, in the general discussion, I haven’t seen any real opposition to the call for: (1) granting the right of inspection to the SD or to the individual SOs/ACs; (2) improving the DIDP process; and (3) requiring ICANN to disclose its contacts with government to influence policy and the expenditures for that purpose.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151102/f31cb9c5/attachment.html>