[CCWG-ACCT] Attempt to summarize discussion regarding Mission and Contract

[Alan Greenberg]

I always thought that it was a sign of intelligence to reconsider 
positions when the situation changes, and particularly when the key 
issues that drove the decision have substantially changed.

I am sure that the good doctor follows this process in his medical practice.

Alan

At 12/11/2015 08:42 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>Far be it for me to wade into this logorrhea, but for needing to
>point that the Sole Member Model was rejected AFTER the fact by the
>very same members appointed by ALAC to the CCWG who had supported it
>DURING the process.
>
>el
>
>On 2015-11-12 15:34, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
>[...]
> > The reason we came back to re-draft the proposal was because first
> > our initial Reference Model, and then the Sole Member Model both
> > received substantial pushback in the public comment.
>[...]
>
>--
>Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
>el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
>PO Box 8421             \     /
>Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community