[CCWG-ACCT] SIDE BY SIDE on Regulation/Contract language

[Andrew Sullivan]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:15:31PM +0000, Burr, Becky wrote:
> I am recirculating the slide that compares the 2nd Draft Report language with alternative language discussed on our last call.  Although some who participated in the discussion found the definition of services to be a bit clunky, folks generally felt that this language could work as direction to drafters.  We need to reach closure on this issue.
> 

With my usual disclaimer in place, I really strongly advise against
the "to be viewed" &c. language.  I sent an alternative and I think
there were some other suggestions as well.  They're all much more
neutral with respect to technology.

A
-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com