[CCWG-ACCT] Update on Board discussions on the CCWG Update

[Nigel Roberts]

I disagree.

2.	Redact the smallest amount necessary.

4.	If you have redacted something that was necessary to redact, but it's 
otherwise publicly available, don't be sententious about it, and 
unredact itm already,


On 25/11/15 13:29, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
>
>
>> On 25 Nov 2015, at 04:21, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>
>> " Guiding Principles for Review of Materials
>>
>> In reviewing the Board Briefing Materials for publication, the following assumptions are to be applied:
>>
>>
>> 2. If redaction is required, redact the smallest amount of material necessary;
> [...]
>> 4. Do not redact information that is already publicly available
>
> #4: An interesting example of the Board already having found it useful to make explicit an important case of the particular, even when it is already covered by a more general statement...
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>