[CCWG-ACCT] Confirm language regarding string as content

[Eric Brunner-Williams]

If it is a different problem, what problem is it?

"the average reader"? now there's a can of worms.

On 11/25/15 2:05 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:06:17PM -0800, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>> I think its fine. The only change I suggest is to use "identifiers formed by
>> sequences of labels consisting of strings" and "in various scripts", rather
>> than "domain names" and "natural language".
> I think that's a different problem, and I think it's much less
> intelligible to the average reader, but I don't care if that's what we
> prefer.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>