[CCWG-ACCT] [Acct-Legal] Lawyers' Meeting on Friday

[Seun Ojedeji]

Just for clarity as well, I was also responding to your comments below:

Farzaneh wrote:
"Yes . Really. I refer you to the meeting that was held on 2 September
2015. https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56133316

I also refer you to the meeting with Board which was held in BA. Please
read the transcript. You can see there is no outright rejection of a
suggested model."

Certainly asking for transcript is from your comments above.

Regards

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 1 Oct 2015 09:29, "farzaneh badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:

> Can I just clarify something here: asking for additional documents and
> advice that Board has received which relate to CCWG work does not one bit
> suggests that we are implying power grab. I find it quite outrageous that a
> simple request for some information that may be or may not be available
> leads to such wrong misinterpretation.
>
> Bruce, Thank you. Your assurance that the documents will be provided to
> the possible extent was what I needed. It's a part of informational
> justice. And thank you for being so responsive throughout.
>
>
> On 1 October 2015 at 10:18, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <
> wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:
>
>> Seun:
>> Overall I think we should recognise the process as a need for power
>> Balance and not a power grab/shift
>>
>> Wolfgang:
>> 1++
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151001/8da179f6/attachment.html>