[CCWG-ACCT] Where do we stand? (Was Re: Blog post on the Accountability work headed to Dublin)

[Seun Ojedeji]

Dear Co-Chairs,

FWIW, I think at this point, it will be good to have an understanding of
where we are heading from the Co-Chairs. In some discussions it seem we
have understood and agreed that a model that implies a structural change is
impractical during this transition phase hence the suggestion made by Steve.

Yet in other discussions it seem we are going ahead with the structural
change model irrespective of the concerns raised from parts of the
community and board.

In other to prepare towards Dublin and contribute in a meaningful way, I
think a summary of where we are presently and what is expected to be
achieved in Dublin will be helpful. I apologise if this has already been
shared, and in that case a pointer will be appreciated.

Regards

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 10 Oct 2015 19:37, "Stephen Deerhake" <sdeerhake at nic.as> wrote:

> Paul,
>
> Perhaps the Board chair is articulating a minority viewpoint?  Afterall,
> the
> Board will have to vote on the matter of sending/not sending the output of
> the CCWG on to NTIA.
>
> Stephen Deerhake
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
> Paul
> Rosenzweig
> Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2015 6:05 AM
> To: 'Bruce Tonkin' <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>; 'Accountability
> Cross
> Community' <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to
> Dublin
>
> With respect Bruce, I share Anne's view that this is not accurate.  The
> Board chair has stated unequivocally that the Board will not submit a
> Membership based proposal.  That is contrary to the statement that the
> Board
> will submit any proposal it receives from the CCWG "as is."  That is
> categorically ruling out one type of "as is" proposal.
>
> If you are seriously telling me that even after all this back and forth the
> Board actually would submit a "Membership only" based proposal to the NTIA
> then I would respectfully say that the Board has done a very poor job of
> communicating.
>
> So ... answer this question please as directly as you are willing:  If,
> today, the CCWG having considered but declined to accept the Board's input
> were to submit a proposal based upon a Membership organization would the
> Board transmit it to the NTIA as the ICANN proposal?
>
> Paul
>
> Paul Rosenzweig
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
> O: +1 (202) 547-0660
> M: +1 (202) 329-9650
> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
> Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
> Link to my PGP Key
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Tonkin [mailto:Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au]
> Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 10:03 PM
> To: 'Accountability Cross Community'
> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to
> Dublin
>
> Hello Paul,
>
> Regarding:
>
>   https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2015-02-12-en
>
> The statement still holds.
>
> The Board has provided input on a draft document so far, and has stated all
> along that it would raise any concerns along the way and not wait for a
> final proposal to raise any concerns.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151010/d13c39fb/attachment.html>