[CCWG-ACCT] ALAC Position on Membership

[Phil Corwin]

Point of information:
I know what the member and designator‎ models are - but what is the reference model?


Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal

Virtualaw LLC

1155 F Street, NW

Suite 1050

Washington, DC 20004

202-559-8597/Direct

202-559-8750/Fax

202-255-6172/cell



"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey



________________________________________
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] on behalf of Drazek, Keith [kdrazek at verisign.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 8:46 AM
To: James Gannon
Cc: Accountability Cross Community
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] ALAC Position on Membership

I agree an explanation would be helpful. Particularly around the choice of timing.

Keith

> On Oct 18, 2015, at 1:43 PM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Given the announcement a few moments ago that the ALAC has voted to no longer support the reference model as presented in the second draft, for those of us who were not able to be in the room I think it would be great if some of our ALAC participants could give a brief overview of the reason for this change and give us some context for this vote taken by the ALAC just so we are fully informed and up to speed.
>
> I don’t want to start a debate but merely would like to be better informed as to the reasoning and background.
>
> -James Gannon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community