[CCWG-ACCT] individual SO/AC elected Board member removal

[Greg Shatan]

We should stick with the SO/AC's procedures, but we may consider specifying
that if they have different levels of decision making, this should be done
at a higher rather than a lower level.

Greg

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
wrote:

> IN all of our work on decisions internal to an SO or, we have taken a
> hands-off view - that the SO or AC itself should use the processes it uses.
>
> If we need to move off that, we should decide that ASAP. And tell the
> SOs/ACs.
>
> Jordan
>
> On 19 October 2015 at 15:27, Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 19/10/15 15:15, Chris Disspain wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The relevant SO/AC then makes a decision. Removal of the Director
>>> requires a 75% majority in the relevant SO/AC.
>>>
>>>
>> 75% of what?
>>
>> (a) All Council members?
>> (b) Council Members voting
>> (c) All SO Members?
>> (d) SO Members casting a vote
>>
>>
>> At least one of these would appear, in practice, to be unlikely in the
>> extreme to ever be triggered.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jordan Carter
>
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
>
> +64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
> Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> Skype: jordancarter
> Web: www.internetnz.nz
>
> *A better world through a better Internet *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151019/cf935c17/attachment.html>