[CCWG-ACCT] AGENDA - Session on 21 Oct

[Seun Ojedeji]

The meeting seem to be consistent with what was earlier shared as the
outcome of the meeting with SO/AC leadership prior to Dublin.

Hence since the objection word seem to be a hobby now, I like to "object"
to the objection made.

Regards

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 21 Oct 2015 11:37, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:

> I agree with Dr Lisse's  objection to this meeting.
>
> I cordially and heartily disapprove of such failures to give notice
> (whether well-intentioned or otherwise, which is doubtful) which inevitably
> appear to lead to perceptions they are designed to reduce or eliminate the
> attendance of those who would be opposed to such deals as appears to be
> common knowledge may or may not have already been reached behind closed
> doors.
>
> It really IS Back to the Future Day today. And today is the day, I fear
> that we are going to repeat the events of 1998 in how the IFWP ended in the
> unilateral creation of ICANN, just as I predicted some months back.
>
> What I could not have predicted is how ironic that this is done today.
>
>
> http://www.martymcflycountdown.com/
>
>
> On 21/10/15 07:04, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>
>> I object and protest against springing meetings on the members without
>> notice, that clash with others and have the effect of reducing
>> participation.
>>
>> el
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151021/caa7cae3/attachment.html>