[CCWG-ACCT] AGENDA - Session on 21 Oct

Roelof Meijer Roelof.Meijer at sidn.nl
Wed Oct 21 17:08:15 UTC 2015


All,

My apologies for unintentionally enhancing confusion on (the planning of)
this afternoon's session.
Things are taking their toll, I am beginning to loose track of what day
and date it is...

Cheers,

Roelof




On 21-10-15 12:49, "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on
behalf of Alice Jansen" <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
on behalf of alice.jansen at icann.org> wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>Per subject line, the agenda below is intended for today - Wednesday, 21
>October.
>Time: 17:00-20:00 UTC - 16:00-19:00 UTC (time converter
><http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CCWG+Accountabil
>i
>ty+Engagement+Session&iso=20151021T16&p1=1440&ah=3>)
>Room: Auditorium
>Session details: 
>https://meetings.icann.org/en/dublin54/schedule/wed-ccwg-accountability
>
>Kind regards
>Alice 
>---
>
>1. Welcome, Roll call, SoI (17:00-17:05)
>2. Further assessment of merits of the models (17:05-18:05)
>3. Taking stock and next steps (18:05-18:50)
>4. Removal of individual Board director (18:50-19:05)
>5. AoC into the Bylaws (if time permits)
>6. Work plan (19:05-19:50)
>7. A.O.B (19:50-20:00)
>
>
>
>On 10/21/15 12:09 PM, "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on
>behalf of Roelof Meijer" <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>on behalf of Roelof.Meijer at sidn.nl> wrote:
>
>>I would think that Alice was referring to our session on Thursday. That
>>was planned quite some time ago.
>>Her email was sent just before midnight, so maybe it was slightly earlier
>>than she thought (or feltŠ)
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Roelof
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On 21-10-15 11:36, "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on
>>behalf of Nigel Roberts"
>><accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>>on behalf of nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:
>>
>>>I agree with Dr Lisse's  objection to this meeting.
>>>
>>>I cordially and heartily disapprove of such failures to give notice
>>>(whether well-intentioned or otherwise, which is doubtful) which
>>>inevitably appear to lead to perceptions they are designed to reduce or
>>>eliminate the attendance of those who would be opposed to such deals as
>>>appears to be common knowledge may or may not have already been reached
>>>behind closed doors.
>>>
>>>It really IS Back to the Future Day today. And today is the day, I fear
>>>that we are going to repeat the events of 1998 in how the IFWP ended in
>>>the unilateral creation of ICANN, just as I predicted some months back.
>>>
>>>What I could not have predicted is how ironic that this is done today.
>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.martymcflycountdown.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>On 21/10/15 07:04, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>>>> I object and protest against springing meetings on the members without
>>>>notice, that clash with others and have the effect of reducing
>>>>participation.
>>>>
>>>> el
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>




More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list