[CCWG-ACCT] Transparency recap (Was: Contribution on Transparency Reforms for CCWG)

[Nigel Roberts]

You mean just like you agreed with the identified consensus on a 
Membership model.

So, to follow the ALAC example, there's no reason why, even if was the 
case that it was a WS2 (which I doubt), it has to remain so.

On 30/10/15 14:17, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> Transparency is needed, but the CCWG identified this as a WS2 issue.