[CCWG-ACCT] Take a break team

[Rudolph Daniel]

Ohh, and I wholeheartedly agree on the decision for a short thoughtful
break... I think such a short break, a kit kat :) , could well be an
invaluable  aid to the process moving forward.

Personally, think we should agree to ban expletives in all forms on CCWG
lists.

Thank you, perhaps we can move on?
RD
On Sep 28, 2015 9:17 AM, "Rudolph Daniel" <rudi.daniel at gmail.com> wrote:

> Generally speaking, IMHO, the co-chairs and all participating CCWG have
> done a magnificent job so far in the face of the complexities and
> difficulties.
> My comment should not be read as comment on any one meeting.
> I was not there.
> RD
> On Sep 28, 2015 9:12 AM, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:
>
>> I resent the below, as I perceive it as insultingly and smugly ironic.
>>
>> Mr Daniel does not appear to have been at the same meeting I was at,
>> which, whilst I would not seek to disparage either side in the battle lines
>> which have, apparently now been drawn, can, I feel be described as nothing
>> less than a failure.
>>
>> If that is a magnificent job, I'd hate to see a workmanlike one.
>>
>> On 28/09/15 01:38, Rudolph Daniel wrote:
>>
>>> And a chance to justify a multistakeholder pat on the back for doing a
>>> magnificent job so far in the global public interest. ;)
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150928/13384d44/attachment.html>